Edit: What do you judge them for?

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Cybertruck drivers.

    ETA: Regular Tesla drivers I give the benefit of the doubt to, because they might have bought their car before they realized Musk is a Nazi dickhead man-child. But cybertruck drivers basically knew and didn’t care (or still fanboi’d over him).

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I saw a cybertruck the other day with a “Bought it before we knew Elon was crazy” bumper sticker on it. I wanna give them the benefit of the doubt, since I myself was pro-Elon once upon a time, but c’mon. I know not everyone stays plugged into the news cycle, but you didn’t know until after you bought the cybertruck?

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        A certain little moustache was generally popular and harmless before Hitler came along, but after the war it forever became the Hitler moustache and shaving one’s face in that style nowadays invites the comparison whether or not one means it that way.

        • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Because if the way I shave, I’m concerned that I’ll have a heart attack just before I finish and I’ll be buried looking like Hitler.

        • abbadon420@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          TIL Trumps father wore a Hitler mustache until 1950.

          After World War II, toothbrush variants were worn by a small number of notable individuals, e.g. American real-estate developer Fred Trump (who wore a split variant), and former president of Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe (covering only the philtrum).

          Trump wore a toothbrush mustache from c. 1935 to 1950, about when it fell out if fashion due yo associations with Adolf Hitler

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      In the UK you can see what year most cars were bought based on the license plate. I absolutely give Tesla owners the benefit of the doubt if it was bought before this year - although Musk showed something of his true personality in 2018.

      But the other day I saw a dude driving a Tesla Y with a '25 plate and I absolutely judged him for buying a car fronted by an actual nazi.

      • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        He showed his personality when he accused a rescue worker of being a pedophile while trying to rescue children trapped in a cave.

        They told Musk to fuck off when he was insisting that his “submarine” can save the day.

        All the money in the world and no brains.

        • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Yup, that’s exactly what I was thinking of from 2018.

          Musk: “I’ll build a submarine to save them, then everyone will love me even more!”
          Cave Rescue Expert: “That’s not an especially practical solution given the situational needs of this resuce operation.”
          Musk: “… er… well… pedo!”

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          and the hyperloop scam was even more unforgivable, basically robbed california of a high speed rail system, which was blocked by trumps 1st term elain chao. and now its just a half-assed attempt with no progression.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      ive seen many teslar drivers bought thier regular tesla cars/suvs after musk went full nazi, like 1-2 years after he bought xitter. they know better, but they are very super-ignorant demographic, apparently alot of them in my area when i look into whos drivers, its asians, im asian.(its like a hybrid of ignorant but still aware of the news of the current events and still purchasing said item/services because it previously had brand recognition thats all they cared about, at the same time low info on the politicla spectrum)

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s not judgement so much as a red flag, but those sunglasses that are like a solid cylinder wrapping around your head. They’re popular with manosphere dudebros, which is unfortunate because I actually kind of like them.

    Lifted pickups that I know cost more than a modest house. It’s the same as buying a sports car, except you’re also posing as a humble working man simultaneously.

    • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s some verses in the Bible that tell you to be wary of those that come dressed clean and godly, that pray in public, and make a spectacle of their worship.
      I forget exactly the words but it is basically that yeah, they’re filthy and ungodly inside.

    • nebulaone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I am convinced most people aren’t religious, or at least agnostic. If they truly were they’d not be living like they are and wouldn’t give a shit about anything but their holy book. I call it being alibi-religious.

      • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I used to wear a cross every day, and i believed… until i realized everyone else around me were all hypocrites for one reason or another and no one actually practiced what they preached.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Cybersecurity people with iphones. Not strictly judging them but it is a grim reminder that even the “professionals” barely understand the technological privacy dystopia we live in.

    • estranho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I work in IT and I harshly judge anyone else in IT who willingly chooses an iPhone.

      When I started with my current company they gave me my choice of iPhone as a company phone (basically last year’s model at no cost, or I could pay a bit and get the latest model)… when I asked if Android was an option I was told “oh, no… Android is open source, so it isn’t secure”. If I didn’t need the paycheck I would have quit right then. I just stared at my boss and didn’t know what to say. I mean, I knew what I wanted to say, but I also didn’t want to tell my new boss that he’s a dumbass.

      So now I carry 2 phones and last year I broke my Android phone and had to use the iPhone as my daily driver for a couple of months. I figured I’d come to appreciate the iPhone but no, there was almost no redeeming qualities.

  • classic@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hm. Cop uniforms. I accurately appraise judge them to likely be problematic in all kinds of ways that might threaten my safety and certainly that of others

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Beats headphones.

    “Oh yeah those look cool. Did you want something that sounds good though?”

    • shadshack@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I used to work retail and was helping a college aged guy pick out some new headphones. He was deciding between some Beats and some Bose headphones. I literally asked him “do you want something that sounds good or looks good” and was amazed he actually said “looks good”. So I reluctantly sold him the Beats.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          I mean, if your intent is to be ignored, why would you want the supposedly “cool” one, then? Seems antithetical, like they’re just a douche who wants to look cool and use it as an excuse to ignore people they don’t want to socialize with.

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I asked for Beats back when i was a teen for my birthday. They were fairly new still and everyone thought it was so cool i had a pair. Eventually they got old and I replaced them with Audiotechnica headphones that were a fraction of the price and holy shit I never knew how poor the sound quality of Beats were before that moment lol.

    • Waggles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Bonus hate for intentionally loud mufflers. These people really don’t care how their decisions affect others.

      • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        The only exception to this would be for motorcycles. I get that they want to be heard so that some driver doesn’t pull out right in front and cut them off, or attempt to change lanes right into them.

        It’s a potentially life saving tactic.

  • Mark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    One of those big trucks but they are immaculate, clean, scuff free. So not used for they are meant for: working.

    Now they are just taking up space and being dangerous to the public just to try and help prop up someone’s ego.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I call those brodozers, and I hate those drivers. I’ve damned near gotten hit by them so many times cuz they can’t see shit over their hood

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I love that my dinky hatchback has more get up and go then they do, they get so fucking offended when you zoom off from a light next to them.

    • gerryflap@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      We have a few of those here in the Netherlands and it’s so ridiculous it’s almost sad. These big American trucks really aren’t fit for Dutch roads. They’re too large for the roads, they don’t fit in any parking lot, and they look ridiculous next to any normal car. I could sort of understand that a farmer would have them, but even then it can’t be that useful because it must be a hassle any time the truck needs to pass through a city or village.

      • Mark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah I should have said: I’m from the Netherlands as well. And my gripes are only valid here I think. The roads here are NOT made for these monster sized units. Parking one of them means you are half way parked on the curb, meaning pedestrians and wheel chairs can no longer pass.

        I’ve seen cases where these “parked units” block the flow of traffic and even trams!! #useless

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah I see them parked at my office and always think - someone drove that enormous truck here, then went up the elevator to their office job. What the fuck?

      I apologize for the misandry but also we have a saying down here - the bigger the truck, the smaller the cock. If you don’t need a work truck for your work, you ought not get a work truck, it’s stupid expensive and gas guzzling. I judge you.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Had a lot of those come through when I worked at Lowe’s. Many were indeed working trucks, but they were towing monster loads, not throwing shit in the back.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      Do you judge people driving clean, scuff free vans as well or only truck drivers?

      I use my truck for work but other than having a roof rack you probably wouldn’t be able to tell it’s a work truck from the outside. When it gets dirty, I wash it, and when it gets dents or scratches I fix them. I don’t want it to look like a beater.

      • Mark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah Sorry, I should have said I’m not American. I’m Dutch. I’ve been to the USA and these things “fit” better in a car-centric society. At least there is room.

        But even there I still question it’s usefulness, you cannot see right in front of you. You’d miss wheelchairs, children, etc. And van’s can usually carry more the the flatbed of a truck.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m not American either - I’m from Finland. I’ve been to the Netherlands, and I can’t quite imagine owning a truck there either.

          However, your criticism was about clean, scuff-free trucks broadly. If you had said that you judge people for owning a truck when they have no practical need for one, I wouldn’t have any issue with that. But that’s not what you said.

          I don’t own one of those gigantic American trucks, but a mid-size one - think Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger, Mitsubishi L200, Nissan Navara, or Isuzu D-Max. The external dimensions and hood height on those are comparable to similarly sized work vans. So when someone needs a vehicle capable of hauling cargo, it’s basically a choice between a truck and a van - and there’s not much difference between the two in terms of pedestrian safety.

          I’d even argue a truck might be safer, because you generally have better all-around visibility. Vans tend to have very limited rear visibility due to the enclosed cargo area. You could argue that a van is more convenient for hauling certain types of cargo, but that’s a separate discussion about practicality - not safety.

          • Mark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well I agree. My first reaction was a bit tongue-in-cheek. On purpose to conjure a very specific image; A person owning a huge monster truck without the intention of using it for it’s intended purpose but for propping up one’s ego.

            A Toyoto Hilux is not something I would consider. More along the lines of: https://www.hotcars.com/the-sickest-lifted-trucks-weve-seen-in-2020/

            Or these: p.s. Vans have camera’s these days, allowing you to even see the ground underneath your fender. So even better then you could ever get with just your mirror’s.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        A 4x4 truck with its big wheels and high ground clearance are features that allow the truck to move off-road. These features have the unfortunate side effect of making them dangerous to other road users, and very uneconomical / environmentally unfriendly. They also take up a lot of space.

        Work vans and most cars are capable of driving on a building site or track.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Hood height, engine size, and the physical exterior dimensions of many vans are similar to those of pickup trucks. When used for work, it often just comes down to personal preference. One key difference is towing capacity - most vans are limited to around 750 kg, whereas trucks typically offer much more. Mine can tow up to 3000 kg.

          Edit: Also, rear visibility in a van is much worse due to the enclosed cargo area. With a truck, you pretty much have 360-degree visibility.

          • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 days ago

            most vans are limited to around 750 kg, whereas trucks typically offer much more. Mine can tow up to 3000 kg.

            Yeah that’s bullshit. Vans that can do the max of 3500kg are common as fuck. You probably looked at the wrong spec. 750kg is the max for a trailer without brakes, regardless of type of car. There are usually two numbers on the spec sheet, one for max towing weight for unbraked trailers and one for braked trailers.

            • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              True, my bad. Many of the most commonly used vans here can tow 2500kg as long as the trailer has brakes. Anything more than that is rare though. Even many of the other mid-size pickups can’t tow 3000kg.

              • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                It may depend on local laws. Here the total weight of the combination (car + trailer) with a B+E driving license is 7000Kg, and 3500Kg for a car. That means you can have a van with 3500Kg capacity plus a 3500Kg trailer. So naturally there are vans that are built to match the max spec.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ford makes (or at least made) and E-350 van. It can tow anything your truck can. And seat 11 people. And keep your equipment secured and safe from the elements. And it has a backup camera.

            • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              This applies to vans just as well though. This Ford Transit is little over a meter longer than a Toyota Hilux so these pictures are roughly to scale.

              • medgremlin@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                But the front/hood is much shorter in length. Also, people driving that type of van are much more likely to be doing so in a professional capacity and are significantly less likely to be asshole drivers fucking around with their phone while driving. People are bad drivers at baseline quite frequently, but if someone is on the job in a van used for commercial purposes, they’re more likely to at least be paying attention and not speeding everywhere.

                Edit: I marked up your image to illustrate the point made much more eloquently in the video. Because of the length of the hood, the truck has a much longer distance of road obstructed from view in front of it, and this is with a standard truck that doesn’t have one of the very popular lift kits (and assuming that the driver is relatively tall.)

                • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  If there’s a 70 cm tall child standing in front of the vehicle, then in either case the child either would or wouldn’t be visible - there’s effectively no difference. It doesn’t really matter whether you can see 2 or 3 meters more of the road surface from one vehicle or the other. In both cases, the hood height is the same, and that’s what determines the safety in the event of a pedestrian collision.

                  Also, with a van, the rear visibility is greatly reduced compared to a pickup. You could say that can be compensated for with cameras - but that same argument applies to the front visibility as well.

                  Let’s also keep in mind where this discussion started from: a commenter was taking issue with clean, scuff-free pickups as if a work truck couldn’t look like that.

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Negatively: Almost any clothing with more than a couple words of text.

    Clothing with a prominent brand.

    Clothing with right-wing political connotations.

    Dyed blonde hair or hair dyed brown/black that should, obviously, be gray.

    Tramp stamps. Japanese writing tattoos on non-Japanese. Face tattoos. Neck tattoos. Tattoos of pop culture themes.

    Expensive cars. Dodge pickup-trucks. Harley Davidson motorcycles. Dodge Chargers. Teslas.

    Police officers.

    Positively: Normal clothing. Well-dressed but obviously not expensive clothing. ‘Funky’ style clothing. Clothing that would just look stupid on me.

    Wildly dyed hair. Subtlety dyed hair that isn’t covering something up.

    Tattoos that are, at least, fairly unique.

    Glasses. (I don’t know, I’m prejudiced for people with glasses.)

    Old women.

    I could probably come up with a lot more. We’re all prejudiced in some way. It’s the things that we’re prejudiced about and how attached we are to those prejudices that define us.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    If someone has a good quality bicycle that they actually use: you got your shit together!

  • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    A ute with no mud on it. Either it’s brand new, or they have no idea what the point of a ute is, so they bought an overpriced car which is worse for them than an average station wagon