I dunno’, it’s arguably GOOD ethics to try and swindle evil-slated money to a normal project. Assuming the normal scientist doesn’t actually make the taped on puppy shredder.

“… that I really don’t know what to think.”

There, you’re starting to get it! That’s exactly what the religious do. Get confused, start using “god did it” as a gap filler in their knowledge, and soon, they “know” less than nothing.

No, it’s not “god of the gaps” to deny elementary school education.

This post is specifically selecting for the complete morons who won’t even listen to a basic explanation of refraction…

If you say, “well a lot of religious people will say that!” then yes. Yes, religious people are morons.

The last time? aaaahahahaa… no. There are several phenomenon that require energy levels that only stellar objects can throw off. They’ll be asking for bigger colliders even when they’re dedicated space stations firing what would be equivalent to weapons of mass destruction at each other.

Unless scientists can figure everything out just by observing space, there will always be a demand for a bigger collider. Since scientists like to control variables and don’t like waiting for random events that they then almost have to reverse-engineer to explain (without most all of the sensitive detectors built in to these colliders), there will always be a demand.

Naw, Rogue One was passable, never mind the few dumb fan service quips. Andor is straight up good. Mando was acceptable.

The rest? Yeaaahh… Disney has added little quality to the universe. At least George expanded the universe in ways that felt natural to the universe, even if he did it like a huge dork.

Disney keeps pulling a Hollywood and making things about grand spectacle with the thinnest of stories and actual plot holes everywhere. It’s … genuinely sad to see a multi BILLION dollar company squander and shit on such an expensive IP. You’d think they’d at least understand they paid a shitload for it and shouldn’t devalue it with garbage productions.

If it’s NVMe, it’s already as fast as it needs to be.

Comparing HDD to NVMe, though… Yea, it makes a big difference! I get frequent, near constant stuttering in some open world games like Elden Ring.

Removed by mod

You are the only one wasting time by giving dumbass avoidance advice instead of telling us what you know.

… What insider information do you have and why do you want to keep us ignorant???

The question was, “why is this a technical limitation?” Not, “what should I do to work around the limitation?”.

Literally not what people are talking about. It’s the “AI” part of the task that doesn’t leave the device (unless it prompts to ask chat gpt). Not that it can magically gleam live info without making any request to the web…

Jeeze, fucking… get your shit straight, making me defend Apple… Fucking do better.

"All of them. Ideally.

… Oh shit, I said that second part oht loud, didn’t I?"

• Every “AI” CEO ever…

Well, in that vein, there are many light weight solar powered “cars”. Some formula of solar panels don’t use much of rare/bad materials, and salt batteries are already a thing, so certain constructions wouldn’t need to climb much of a hill to become a net-positive.

I dunno’ man, some Irish and Swedish folks are suuuuper damn pasty-white. Give 'em a little scare and some turn paper white. xD

They are saying there are zero cars that fit the bill. Why is an “unusual” car not part of “all cars”? It’s a basic question of what set is being considered.

Of course if you limit “cars” to be anything that is over 1000lbs with an engine, THAT set of “cars” is going to be far less economical than some other vehicles that many would still call a “car”.

Does it have to be usual when the qualifier on the negative is “none”?

It’d definitely increase the chances of your immune system seeing any fragments!

WRONG!! Velomobiles and other man-powered (or nature powered) land vehicles absolutely exist.

I’d argue if you’re making the human more efficient than walking, you’re reducing CO2 output compared to simply walking there.

If a reduction in human CO2 compared to distance traveled isn’t good for the environment, then nothing is good for the environment.

No, that’s NOT begging the question, that’s just being an ass about actually asking a question.

Nah, doesn’t have to be such straight forward tit for tat crap. That’s far less interesting.

For an example, they really dropped the ball in the Obi-Wan show. They could’ve made it a great story about how he basically HAD to become a Grey Jedi. Explore how the “goodie two shoes” aspect of the Jedi clashes with the real world. Put Obi-Wan through a ton of real-world situations where he HAS to go against the Jedi code to get any kind of positive result.

SHOW how the Jedi are naive, don’t just declare it so and throw a supervillain at them.

Maaaaybe, but it’d have to be in a form that’s still recognized through digestion and absorption in the guts.

The most likely result would just be some upset tummies if some gut bacteria likes the pieces(if any even survive digestion) and it’d likely give no extra resistance.