• AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m actually pretty worried about him dying. Hopefully he has a chosen successor that he’s indoctrinated.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      149
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would rather hope that he legalizes and codifies the “flat” management structure, disallowing any one figure head from taking over and fucking things up.

      Valve annoys people because it can be slow to choose to do something, because everyone works on what they want to work on, but it means average workers have a lot more agency in how they’re involved in the company.

      I’m sure there’s till unofficial cliques and leaders, but having it in legalese for the employees post-Gabe would be nice.

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would argue the flat management makes it hard for Valve to produce things and they should re-evaluate it, but you can do this while also not turning into a rank and yank shit out fortnite clones 420 69 flossing scheme to fuck over users and line their pockets.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that’s a valid take, and I think Valve has sort of re-evaluated it, because if I recall correctly, they kind of had to “put on hold” the “do whatever you want” bit to get Half Life: Alyx out of the door. So, imho, it seems like they’re capable of doing both. They managed to produce a high quality VR game by putting the “flat” on the backburner, and them coming back to it later.

          Although, to be fair, I hadn’t heard anything similar about the SteamDeck or any Valve hardware, really. So if they can make a SteamDeck from scratch, an entire new product category, with the flat management structure, I bet it’s not holding them back half as much as some folks at GlassDoor seem to think.

          • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its really hard to get a look inside Valve, because I can’t confirm/deny the Steam Deck came about because of the flat management. I’ll be honest, my apprehension about their management stems from the many failed attempts to conclude the franchise they started in Half-Life and how 20 different projects died to get to Alyx. Would a change in leadership get us more of the same? Maybe. It would probably be a substandard product, and i’m still recovering from Starfield being mid.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with that is that they’re a private company so that can just be undone by the largest share holder, unless that codification also splits up his equity across the employees.

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbf as long as it doesn’t go public it will probably be fine regardless of who takes the job. It doesn’t take a genius to keep up the good work in a company that can afford to plan long time.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        86
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I guess you’ve never had a “new boss” come in, huh? Even in a private company?

        Man, new bosses love to shake things up, to “make the workplace theirs.” It’s literally one of the most common things to happen when new bosses come, and very often it results in a deep change in company interpersonal politics.

        Barry used to be your go-to guy, but the new boss has decided they just don’t like Barry. Why? They couldn’t tell you, but Barry gets under their skin, so it doesn’t matter how he’s the best guy on the team who can handle whatever is thrown at him, his role is going to be dilluted and minimized and he’s going to be pushed and prodded by negative management to try to get him to just quit. Eventually, Barry will just quit because who wants to work under those conditions. Barry found a better job, and now he’s replaced by your new bosses 20-something nephew who doesn’t know what the fuck he is doing at all and everyone can’t stand. He’s a fucking loser who keeps getting promoted by the new boss.

        I’ve been through that too many times to pretend it’s just “that easy.” No, generally the kind of people drawn to that role are controlling dickheads who have their own dickhead “vision” of being the biggest dickhead to ever dickhead.

        • fluckx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But how am I supposed to prove my exorbitant salary if I can’t prove I’m doing something. If I don’t change anything they’ll realize I don’t do anything and can’t do anything! As for my next idea, we need to put ads in steam because everybody is doing it. And people should watch a promo video before their game starts because look at how successful YouTube is! I’m a genius for doing this. YOU ALL JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND.

          ~ some manager, somewhere…probably

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hey, did you know your lemmy account is set to appear as a bot and some users may be filtering your comments as a result? You can change this in your lemmy profile settings.

            • fluckx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh dear. Thanks for letting me know.

              It must have been on by default, or I must have accidentally clicked it.

              Thank you for pointing that out! I appreciate it.

              Have a great day !

              • can@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thank you for acknowledging it! Maybe a third of the people I’ve mentioned this to respond.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have seen it. Good managers walk in and watch their team for months to learn how things work before making changes. Bad managers walk in and change things before learning why they work the way they do. We saw that with Twitter/X.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            A good CEO uses the 30-30-30 method.

            The first 30 days they are observing, the next 30 days they are asking questions, the last 30 days is coming up and proposing improvements.

            Only after those first 90 days a real decision can be made.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d never heard of it that way before and that’s interesting. Thanks for sharing.

        • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I fucking hate your comment. Good work capturing the exact futile frustration you’re describing.

        • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Unless they fuck it up somehow in recruiting a new CEO, Valve really wouldn’t find it hard to ask a new CEO “Here’s our revenue, and our expenses, our profits. How would you keep this in place without crashing our revenue stream and maybe doing new greenfield stuff?”

          If their first words are: “Well, I like the idea of charging our customers an install fee…” you know to keep looking.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are right in that Steam would probably continue on just fine on autopilot. You might not be right by assuming that the sort of person who would seek to and achieve such a position wouldn’t let their own ego dictate every decision–change for change’s sake so that they can point at how wonderful they are at the job.

        • Davel23@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While nepotism is almost universally a bad thing, Gabe has shown that he does not subscribe to the “profit at any cost” school of business, but instead believes that if you provide a good service people will pay you for it. Hopefully he’s been able to pass those values on to his son.

          • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My concern is his son despite having this shit DRILLED INTO HIS HEAD (which I can’t guarantee) will chase a cashout. That’s the one problem with nepos.

            The other problem is if he’s qualified for the job. Which feeds into point 1.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yesterday I bought something on Steam for the first time in many years. (I have a large Steam library, but in recent years I’ve been getting games from gog and itch instead.)

    Since I hadn’t bought from Steam in a long time I figured I should read the “Steam Subscriber agreement” that you have to click to accept when you buy something. Let me just say now, the agreement is a very very bad deal for customers.

    It goes to great lengths to make it very clear that you don’t own anything. You aren’t buying anything, you have no essentially rights. You are simply paying for a license subscription to use software with various conditions. Valve is able to end your subscription with no refund if you break the agreement. And the best bit:

    Furthermore, Valve may amend this Agreement (including any Subscription Terms or Rules of Use) unilaterally at any time in its sole discretion.

    So by using Steam we’re putting a lot of trust in Valve; because the ‘agreement’ basically says they can do whatever they want, any time they want, for any reason they want.

    Steam is quite good. I particularly appreciate their Linux support. But they are clearly using their position of dominance to make people agree to unfavourable terms. At the moment, things are fine. But make no mistake - when you use Steam, Valve has all the power. They can screw people over whenever they choose to.

    With all that in mind, buying DRM free is better if you want to still have access to the software when a company decides to change direction for whatever reason.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently you like to read. Open the EULA for basically any commercial software (not FOSS or open source, costs money, isn’t made by some small company, basically the same criteria as >90% of the games on Steam) and you are going to learn 2 things very quickly. First, all of them are just a license to use, and second, if there are patches or an online component you will have at least as many caveats and restrictions as what is included in the Steam TOS.

      Now, I’m not saying you’re wrong or that I’m okay with this situation (I look for open source, free, then paid for all the software that lets me do whatever it is I’m trying to do), but the situation with Steam is very typical.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Terms like that matters more for some services than for others. For something like Spotify or Netflix, if they terminate the agreement it doesn’t matter much. You lose access, but there was no accumulated value. So you can just go somewhere with only minor inconvenience. Whereas on Steam, if they terminate the agreement then you could lose decades worth of accumulated games from your library - which could be very valuable. So that’s a big difference.

        Now, it’s unlikely that Steam will just press delete on everyone’s account. But we can imagine a very profit-hungry leader taking over Steam and deciding to put the squeeze on their vast user-base. There are many things they could do; such as adding ads, requiring ‘consent’ to include spyware on your computer, or charging additional fees. Long term users would not be in a position to refuse these things, because their Steam library is being held as collateral.

        If you trust that Steam is never going to give you up, and never going to let you down, etc. Then there is no problem. Things are currently going fine, and they may continue to be fine for a very long time. It’s just a matter of trust, and power, and hedging.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing here is, people will talk and if there are any serious issues, a lot of people, myself included, will have no moral objection to pirating the games they already paid for access to. And in some jurisdictions, it won’t even be illegal. Like with most enshittification situations, it isn’t going to be there one day and gone the next, so liberating your games won’t be overly difficult.

          The big gotcha will be online multi-player games. If you don’t have a server, the client doesn’t matter.

    • pkpenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t matter, Steam offers DRM free games. Steam DRM is opt-in and can be broken by anyone in seconds, and games with other DRM have a big glowing warning on their store page. You give money to Steam for their servers that support multiplayer, their workshop, seamless patching, user forums, image hosting, controller support, Proton for Linux, SteamDB, easy multiplayer via the friends interface, achievement tracking, and a large majority cut to the developers. Your complaints apply to basically every storefront, the only way you’ll own data is by having it on your own disk which Steam lets you do.

        • pkpenguin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on the game, sometimes you can just delete the steam dll next to the executable, others require a steam emulator which amounts to just dropping in a spoofed steam dll. I think the preferred emulator these days is Goldberg steam emu on gitlab.

        • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you have Baldur’s Gate 3 you can boot it up from the Larian Launcher even if Steam is closed.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very good point. Just because Valve hasn’t screwed us over yet is no excuse for assuming they never will.

      • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to say it won’t happen, but if a corporation tried to mess with steam libraries, it would raise hell like nothing the internet has ever seen.

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah? And what would that achieve? What the hell are gamers gonna do?

          For God’s sake, we couldn’t even keep a protest going on Reddit because people were afraid of the sunk costs. People give Valve money.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Valve isn’t going to remove your purchases unless Valve goes bankrupt.

              But make no mistake, they will do other anti-consumer and anti-competitor bullshit once Gabe leaves and the company becomes publicly traded.

              Things like throttling your download speed unless you pay their subscription. Being forced to watch ads whenever you browse your library.

              This is why we should NEVER put so much trust in a company that they can build up a monopoly, like all those Gabe stans are doing.

              • Asafum@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                This one corpos.

                I just threw up a little bit thinking about that future that 100% is coming when the business school fuckheads take over valve.

                There is no “good will” towards customers, it’s everything is a service and every single aspect of our product should be monetized… Downloading is a cost, monetize it! Browsing libraries has eyeballs focused on it, advertise!

                To these assholes it’s dumb not to do that.

              • Kedly@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Is it being a Stan to recognize all of the so called “competition” is dog shit? You want more competition? Provide better alternatives, there are VERY FEW corp’s with the pro customer attitude history that Valve has

                • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  But that’s the key word, isn’t it – “history”?

                  Valve hasn’t screwed us over yet, and that’s why I like them very much. Now. But neither did Google or Reddit, in the beginning. In fact, Reddit was a safe haven for people who left Digg after it became pay to win, and look at them now.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not saying that I disagree, but it has basically always been written like that…

      • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but that’s not a reason that something is bad. As pointed out. Buying DRM free is the only possibility to really own the games you purchased.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can use them both of course. That’s what I do, and I usually just go with the one with the best price or best deal.

        If it’s a game that I really need to be DRM free, then GoG is best.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s anothee way to keep having access to software no matter what companies do.

      I have the generic steam crack well saved in my computer in case the decide to pull the plug.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Steam effectively makes buying games itself count as MTX. They’re making your Steam library no different from your MMO inventory.

      That said, I’m addicted.

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, if you would own it, they would have a very different legal framework to be working in. Would they be legally allowed to shut down their servers? Or would they have to run the company until bankruptcy, so maybe decades after steam stopped being profitable? Their product is a service based on. They want the service to be able to be ended. If you buy the games like you do on steam and you own them, can they end it?

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It goes to great lengths to make it very clear that you don’t own anything. You aren’t buying anything, you have no essentially rights. You are simply paying for a license subscription to use software with various conditions. Valve is able to end your subscription with no refund if you break the agreement.

      True, but:

      but in recent years I’ve been getting games from gog

      GOG shills always claim their platform is better because muh DRM-free games and actual ownership but GOG’s User Agreement states:

      We give you and other GOG users the personal right (known legally as a ‘licence’) to use GOG services and to download, access and/or stream (depending on the content) and use GOG content. This licence is for your personal use. We can stop or suspend this licence in some situations, which are explained later on.

      • Minnels@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But once you have downloaded the installer you have the game drm free. Put it on a usb stick or whatever, your gog account doesn’t matter any more.

        • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. That’s the difference. GOG can withdraw their services, but not the software that you’ve downloaded. Whereas Steam explicitly states that using the software may require their services (and it usually does).

    • UnderwaterSwift@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s to keep people from doing stuff like requiring refunds or court cases for being banned, VAC or otherwise. To make some things not technically gambling, etc.

      Valve is the paragon of gamers. They offer a great portal, free no bs family shares, pressure companies into sales on legacy software. Push VR from meme status (the oculus is even originally stolen valve tech look it up). Steam stream, steam controller, steam deck emulation of Nintendo switch, Jesus it’s endless.

      And still there are people like you out here who have to lead with complaints about a bunch of text which everyone knows is exclusively for legal piss matches against companies and troublemakers.

      I don’t know how you can be pleased by anything. Isn’t your life tiring living the life of a zealot? Or do you have just an unsatisfiable need to complain?

      • sfgifz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The company may be nice now and it’s okay to be happy with them, but that doesn’t mean you attack the personality of someone for pointing out factual information written in your beloved companies agreements.

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will never ever understand how a normal person can ever worship / love a corporation… It has to be some kind of mental illness.

          Corporations DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU! Sooner or later they will fuck you unless you are constantly pushing back against them and keeping them on their toes. Relaxing, just becuase Steam is good right now, is not a option.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know how you can be pleased by anything. Isn’t your life tiring living the life of a zealot? Or do you have just an unsatisfiable need to complain?

        wtf man. Did someone shit in your breakfast cereal or something?

        • UnderwaterSwift@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re the one getting mad at steam for things they could “maybe” do in the future. Stop incepting yourself with fantasy and then posting about it. “Hey guys you won’t BELIEVE what’s in this EULA” “Did you know TECHNICALLY valve could just do whatever they want?!?”

          From your post history you’re older, you know EULAs are so ignored across the board that they’re there for entirely legal reasons. Oh yeah a company that has done all this good, (for you especially, without valve it’s safe to say there would be ZERO Linux gaming support like there is now.) But we better be ready for something that’s just completely antithetical to their history of actions because of some creative writing episode you’ve dreamed up. Corporations are bad capitalism is bad, open software and Linux gaming only please. No rights, no AAA just indie titles and slow burn, artistically crafted projects of love.

          You’re like the vegans of computer science you’re insufferable.

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People probably felt the same way Unity’s relatively fair licensing terms, or D&D’s license. They’ve rolled back now, but it’s common for companies to push this sort of thing, roll back, and then slowly introduce the same thing.

        The point is not to avoid Steam, but to keep an eye out for scummy moves because no entity operating for profit is immune to temptation. Be ready to abandon ship should the time come or you’ll be the one left holding the bag.

    • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      NoOoOoO. You’re not allowed to bad mouth Steam here. Everything steam does is amazing. Steam is nothing like those filthy console companies. Steam good guys. Steam forever friend

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      ·
      1 year ago

      It involves golden tickets and the unsolved disappearances of a handful of children.

      Brutal, I know, but it’s the only way.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I selfishly wish he had a son or daughter to carry on his legacy lol

        More generations deserve to know how good Valve is.

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Son/daughter would be like “ugh, this is lame, I want to play real-world games with peoples’ lives. …like, corporate wars, or screw-the-smallguy.”

          Kids never handle the inheritance right, and passing on the experiences they need in order to do so is hard as fuck.

      • jdf038@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chat GPT predicts one of the kids will…

        …get physically pulled into valves code? Not sure how that happens lol

        🎵 One clicked on files they shouldn’t dare Now lost in code, they’ve disappeared in air Gaben warned, but they didn’t heed Now in the depths of Steam, they’ll forever plead

        🎵 Oompa loompa doompety dah If you’re not careful, you’ll go too far Respect the rules when visiting Gaben’s lair Or vanish forever, lost in Valve’s software!

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but whales are gonna get all the tickets. There’s no IRL Charlie luck magic.

    • aluminium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To implement NFT Microtransaction RNG lootboxes into their games while letting them rott?

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          HeadTrak AWP

          “Can’t click heads? Don’t worry about it, because this AWP follows its namesake by finding clickable heads for you. Just aim down the sights and let the HeadTrak tech do the rest.”

          Available in limited edition Season 7 Pass Lv.50, Lv.75, and Lv.100 Crates.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh shid and cume. Isn’t that sorta what the free loot cards are? The ones you get randomly for doing stuff in games. Iirc you can sell them on their marketplace for money. It isn’t unreasonable for a new dick head CEO to just overhaul that system into a more active gacha system for all their games.

        • aluminium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I was making a joke about CS2, TF2 and Dota 2

          Especially TF2 however since they show 0 care to that game but still milk it.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I couldn’t imagine any decent reason valve would get people in charge that would want to go public with it. They have all the capital in house to fund any idiotic thing they may want to try. No reason to risk sharing profits with outside investors.

  • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If a game is on GOG, I’d rather buy it there than on steam. Steam is great and they do a lot of great stuff, but you don’t own the game if you buy it through steam.

    • bigpEE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m very anti-DRM as well, but I’m willing to give Valve my money even if there’s a chance I lose my game down the line. Some of that money’s going towards Proton and making Linux more popular

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do the same. Just because the platform is great does not mean it will be in the future.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That, sadly, is the future. Valve is one of those rare companies that put out something interesting then got out of the way so that others could put out their ideas. Steam and PAX are a fantastic way to enable the creativity of others. I will keep my fingers crossed that this all works out, but I am fully prepared to be sad between now and, say, 10 years in the future.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I buy my favorite games from GOG when they’re there so that I can keep the install files forever.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Steam turns to shit I’ll just pirate all my games again. I’ve already paid for them anyway.

  • Veraxus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe we’ll get lucky and Gaben will leave ownership of the company collectively to it’s employees.

    • spaduf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Valve becoming a coop is the only way I could envision them avoiding a worst case corporate scenario.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, why ruin something already raking in money hand over fist? Valve is profitable, sustainable, and all around well executed.

    Messing with it would cut profits!

    • CTDummy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The same reason countless studios have destroyed successful IPs (like EA). Sure it’s profitable but it could be MORE profitable. Sales were up last year? Cool story, have sales improved over that this year though??

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not just shareholders, I mean that’s a huge part why public corporations endlessly seek growth. But, even private corporations are beholden to capitalism’s inherent growth imperative.

        The only way to maintain solvency is to grow. Without growth you can’t save, and if you can’t save, you can’t accumulate investment capital. Which basically means your corporation is stuck in stagnation and is being eaten alive by interest rates.

        • bigpEE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          without growth you can’t save

          What? Why? If I’m making a million dollars profit a year, why can’t I just put it in a bank account or ETFs or whatever every year?

            • bastion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Putting back into your company is fine. It’s the endless profiteering that sucks, and that ultimately reduces customer experience. Steam keeps it’s niche specifically by producing a great customer experience, and getting out of the way.

              Steam is also putting back into their company. But there’s no need for enshittification. That’s a publicly-traded-company, tragedy-of-the-commons thing.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wtf are you babbling about? What salary man do you know that’s “elite”? They aren’t even petite bourgeoisie, they just think they are. The middle class is dead.

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                A CEO isn’t a salary man… A salary man is just a white collar worker who works for a salary, not hourly. Which is typically taken advantage of by having them work a tremendous amount of unpaid overtime.

                Also, salaries are generally the least attractive part of being paid as a CEO. Taking the majority of your compensation as stock options allows you to avoid income tax.

                • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Then why is their salary extremely insanely out of proportion in a destructive manner orders of magnitude over any sane number?

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why? Because the enshittification is based on short sighted greed over long sighted sustainable income.

      This is what going public means. Now it is time to grind it to dust and snort it so the elite can have their fifth christmas bonus

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because MBA- and CEO-brains say that raking in money hand over fist doesn’t matter unless you can rake in consistently more and more money hand over fist. What normal people see as stable profits, they see as underperforming versus the bigger profits they see only in their head.

    • redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      But if we add a subscription required to access already bought game we would surely make more money this quarter. Or how about charging for online play.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the end, the people who make these sorts of decisions will often bail out with their quarterly bonuses before the poo hits the fan. It’s everyone else who has to deal with the fallout.

    • Sami_Uso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So he’s going to stay in his position way past when he reasonably should because of pride and not take advice from his friends and family to step down so he could transfer power to a worthy successor?

      • Corigan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s not place all the blame on her Republicans were going to let Obama place anyone on the supreme Court. They rejected all his nominations. It was wait for Democrats to have full control or hang on cause Republicans wouldn’t let anyone but a Republican get nominated.

        She was damned if she did damned if she didn’t. But cause see hanged on we all blamed her instead of rightful raging at McConnell

        • Sami_Uso@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Republicans seem to throw their weight around all the time and never need this excuse. Dems have no teeth, they never have. They had 2 years of full control during Obama’s first term and couldn’t get anything done and let the GOP carve up Affordable Care just so they could take pretend it was bipartisan. The excuses just get old, I’ve been hearing them since they let bush steal the election

  • 018118055@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It needs some legally bulletproof foundation structure to own the company and continue with his values. Not easy but possible.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey now. A divorce could also sink things. He doesn’t have to die for things to go to shit.

    (I know nothing of his personal life.)

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well his name didn’t show up in Epstein’s public records (unlike a certain CEO from a company Microsoft bought/CEO that founded/ran Microsoft) so we’re fine there.

      And I did look. Extensively.

      It’s a good sign because 1) He’s smart enough to not have a paper trail and/or 2) His hobbies are innocuous, like, I think he really only cares about submersibles and knives and he wasn’t stabbing people on some carbon fiber tube near the titanic so he’s not a dumbass either.