• CTDummy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The same reason countless studios have destroyed successful IPs (like EA). Sure it’s profitable but it could be MORE profitable. Sales were up last year? Cool story, have sales improved over that this year though??

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not just shareholders, I mean that’s a huge part why public corporations endlessly seek growth. But, even private corporations are beholden to capitalism’s inherent growth imperative.

      The only way to maintain solvency is to grow. Without growth you can’t save, and if you can’t save, you can’t accumulate investment capital. Which basically means your corporation is stuck in stagnation and is being eaten alive by interest rates.

      • bigpEE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        without growth you can’t save

        What? Why? If I’m making a million dollars profit a year, why can’t I just put it in a bank account or ETFs or whatever every year?

          • bastion@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Putting back into your company is fine. It’s the endless profiteering that sucks, and that ultimately reduces customer experience. Steam keeps it’s niche specifically by producing a great customer experience, and getting out of the way.

            Steam is also putting back into their company. But there’s no need for enshittification. That’s a publicly-traded-company, tragedy-of-the-commons thing.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Wtf are you babbling about? What salary man do you know that’s “elite”? They aren’t even petite bourgeoisie, they just think they are. The middle class is dead.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              A CEO isn’t a salary man… A salary man is just a white collar worker who works for a salary, not hourly. Which is typically taken advantage of by having them work a tremendous amount of unpaid overtime.

              Also, salaries are generally the least attractive part of being paid as a CEO. Taking the majority of your compensation as stock options allows you to avoid income tax.

              • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Then why is their salary extremely insanely out of proportion in a destructive manner orders of magnitude over any sane number?

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Their total compensation is… But, the vast majority of their compensation packages are made up of stock options and bonuses.

                  I’m not claiming that they aren’t being paid way too much money, just that when people talk about a salary employee they don’t typically think of the CEO.