• Maiq@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Alright you primitive screw heads, listen up! You see this? This, is my boomstick! The twelve-gauge double-barreled Remington. S-Mart’s top of the line. You can find this in the sporting goods department. That’s right, this sweet baby was made in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Retails for about a hundred and nine, ninety five. It’s got a walnut stock, cobalt blue steel, and a hair trigger. That’s right, shop smart shop, S-Mart. You got that?

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Introducing firearms even sooner in history… What could go wrong. Surely won’t change the course of history or anything. ☺️

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Being a gun nut, I’ve thought on this. Take something simple like an AR-15 back. They wouldn’t have had the metallurgy 150 years back to duplicate it. Not the barrel or bolt anyway. Springs? Certainly not the propellant. What about the precision needed for the shells alone? And forget rifling a barrel!

        I’ve got a couple of 130-yo, double-barrelled shotguns. One is Damascus steel, the other is Belgian laminated steel. Sounds fancy, may rapidly disassemble with modern shot.

        Bet the mechanisms and overall design would be a mind blower! Mankind, being mankind, would certainly figure a way to get some kinda better killing machine out of the deal.

        LOL, this would have been a solid /r/AskHistorians question!

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’d want something that can help people and can be tested and has an immediate, dramatic effect to make it undeniable

    Maybe insulin? You could literally bring comatose people back from the brink of death in minutes

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Wouldn’t anyone needing insulin already be dead? Or is there a middle ground where a diabetic can go in and out of shock, yet survive without?

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They would survive for awhile after diagnosis on a starvation diet, maybe weeks, and slipping in and out of a coma but it was a death sentence. There’s stories from the 1920’s when whole wards of kids were hit with a first dose that removed the symptoms in minutes. I can’t imagine being in that room when all that despair and anguish turned into hope and relief.

  • kelpie_returns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Generator. Television. PS2. Cowboy Bebop on DVD.

    Idk if it would work at all, but TANK is such a good fucking song, and I hope they enjoy at least that much before burning me for witchcraft.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    How far back are we talking?

    I mean the 90s were about 30 years ago (sorry for making you feel old).

    So let’s say that that I managed to find a way to travel in time, and had time to prepare for a trip to 95…

    I will also assume that it is a paradox self correcting time travel deal.

    I’d bring an iPhone with me, that should convince anyone that I am from the future.

  • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    A list of everything the church has ever had to walk back(they classified capybaras as fish), along with the scientific proof. And a thousand doses of Keflex.

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would bring a list of supernovas that occured in my past, but in the future of the time I traveled to. A couple matching observations will provide indisputable proof that I have information from the future.

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      At first I thought you talked about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Been a while since I heard Supernova for it’s actual meaning o_o

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ve never heard a nuclear bombing described as a supernova, but you do you?

          • LostXOR@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            More of a reverse supernova I’d think. You’re starting with the very heavy elements and fissioning them into lighter ones.