• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    213
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    No matter their reputation, every furry I’ve ever met has been a decent person.

    My daughter likes to point out that the kids in her old school hated furries but loved the sports mascot guy in a fursuit.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      7 months ago

      there are definitely some shitty ones, but in general, the community fosters good people, and good interactions, it’s supposed to be an escapism after all.

    • Forester@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      7 months ago

      One of the characteristics of autism is rigid morals even when the morals will present a negative outcome for the one who holds those morals.

        • Forester@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I think it’s gone over everyone’s head that I’m a furry from the furry instance The implication being that I’m also on the spectrum. This is based on my own experience and antidotes my first hand assessment of the furry fan base is that it’s full of people that possess a higher than average set of autistic traits. Like half of us are in stem Fields.

          • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m relatively sure anyone in frequent contact with members of the furry community can probably provide anecdotal evidence of autistic trait correlation, myself included.

            I’m sorry you got the negative reaction for the previous post, but I’m glad someone else backed up the claim of rigid moral values. It’s an interesting link that seems to resonate with me.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      74
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not equating furries to pedophiles here, as I have absolutely no problems with them what so ever…

      But this is the equivalent of saying people hate pedophiles, but love children. It’s pretty obvious that the sexualization is the difference.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          As I said in another post, I was under the incorrect impression that it was primarily/exclusively a sexual fetish.

          I still stand by my point because according to wikipedia it seems like sexualization is, at least, a major subculture within it, if not an outright majority.

          To be clear about my point, two consenting adults can do whatever they want with each other as far as I’m concerned, and if they aren’t hurting anyone, they are alright with me. But the reason people are weird about furries and not a mascot is the sexualization attached to furries, whether justified or not, while anthropomorphized animal mascots are not about sexualizing anything.

      • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        "I’m not implying that taco eaters are responsible for the pandemic, mind you…

        But there was always a line around the block at Taco Bell in the early days of the pandemic."

        The moment you say “I’m not equating benign X with problematic Y”, you immediately put the idea in people’s head that X and Y have a strong correlation which serves to further skepticism and judgment of benign X.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          If I didn’t do that, I would inevitably be accused of equating them. So I explicitly pointed out that I’m noy equating them. If people interpret that there is a strong correlation between the two, despite what I explicitly said, then that’s on them. If I hadn’t made it clear, then that would be on me.

      • Zyratoxx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just in case I get you right. I think you are confusing being a Furry with practising sodomy. As a Furry I can assure you, that this accounts for a very small subgroup that - at least I - tend to avoid. Sex is nice as long as everyone consents and is mentally able to consent.

        If I got you wrong please clarify what you meant. I don’t want to accuse you of anything ^-^

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think you are confusing being a Furry with practising sodomy.

          Nah, I was under the incorrect impression that it was primarily/exclusively a sexual fetish. I still stand by my point because according to wikipedia it seems like sexualization is, at least, a major subculture within it, if not an outright majority.

          • Zyratoxx@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I do see your point (I think). On the other hand yiff has a wide range from humans with animal features (catgirls, cowgirls, …) up to the more hardcore furry porn. I for example would also say that I have “a minor sexual interest” but that interest does not include the real hardcore stuff.

            And with Furry content showing strongly humanified animals it is arguable how bad/harmful said fetish is. But I have to admit that I have too found myself questioning if a bit of yiff I had just seen was a bit too much, but where to draw the line is ultimately highly subjective.

            I still wouldn’t compare them to people that sexualize underage (anime) kids just from the matter of fact that kids exist irl whilst humanified beasts are just a product of imagination.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              This is not a fetish that I think is bad at all. Seems completely harmless to me, assuming it’s all consenting adults.

              I’m just pointing out that this is why I believe people view furries differently than mascots.

  • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m still waiting for the cat girls…

    Edit: For whoever is downvoting me, this is literally the same group that hacked a nuclear research lab last year. Their demand was that they begin serious research into the creation of real life catgirls.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I didn’t downvote you, but the context is appreciated because I didn’t know why you said that.

      • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        My bad! I’m honestly surprised they didn’t mention it in the article! It’s journalistic gold!

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      AND THE RESEARCH?!

      That sounds like an interesting line of study, do you have and further insight on progress?

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lemmy has gotten a lot less civil recently, people just downvoting for no reason and calling each other shit they wouldn’t dare say to a living person in front of them

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wouldnt call a few downvotes ‘less civil’. Without the edit, the parent comment looked like a weird non sequitur. With the comment there was more context and now it has a lot of upvotes.

        • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 months ago

          Totally why I clarified. I realized people probably had no idea what I was talking about. I figured more people would get the reference, but was obviously wrong. Not anyone’s fault there but mine!

          Couldn’t not share it with people though. Such a crazy piece of news…

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean, downvotes are supposed to be for irrelevant comments. Anyone who missed the reference would easily assume it to be irrelevant.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I think it’s amusing how there are several people ITT that think the way people use upvotes and downvotes changed all because some amorphous entity tied to Lemmy said so.

          They are absolutely “I agree with this” and “I disagree with this” buttons, Hexbear should have definitively proven that to all of you.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Just because people stick cotton swabs in their ears doesn’t mean that they’re supposed to be used for that.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        people just downvoting for no reason

        Not what they’re for. The downvote is not a “I disagree with this comment” button, It is a measure of how relevant to the discussion a comment is.

        In this case your comment about how everyone is bad and evil and everything is actually not at all relevant to anything in this discussion

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s amusing how there are several people ITT that think the way people use upvotes and downvotes changed all because some amorphous entity tied to Lemmy said so.

          They are absolutely “I agree with this” and “I disagree with this” buttons, Hexbear should have definitively proven that to all of you.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Among highly skilled hackers, I wonder what percentage are either on the spectrum, furry, or LGBTQ (or some combination thereof). It’s got to be at least 50%. Anyway, great work here!

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    7 months ago

    Earlier this year, SiegedSec claimed to have hacked the River Valley Church of Burnsville, Minnesota — and to have spent $6,200 in church funds to purchase 100 inflatable sea lions

    I would have forced them to spend $100 on as many shelters and food kitchens that they could find, and then see if River Valley would try to do a charge back on each one.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      [last lines] TV Anchorman: In a surprise announcement, the Republican National Committee has revealed it is bankrupt. A spokesman for the party said they had plenty of money in their accounts last week, but today they just don’t know where the money has gone. But not everybody is going begging. Amnesty International, Greenpeace and the United Negro College Fund announced record earnings this week, due mostly to large, anonymous donations.

      • Sneakers
  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    7 months ago

    Still beats me how they manage to use the keyboard with those big fluffy paws…

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I will never get tired of seeing headlines that start with “Gay furry hackers” because if the Venn diagram is that intersectional, it’s schaudenfreude story time with spicy drops! 🍿

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Earlier this year, SiegedSec claimed to have hacked the River Valley Church of Burnsville, Minnesota — and to have spent $6,200 in church funds to purchase 100 inflatable sea lions — after its lead pastor, Rob Ketterling, allegedly made transphobic remarks. In the past, Ketterling said the legalization of gay marriage would lead to the legalization of pedophilia, polygamy, and bestiality.

    That’s pretty awesome.

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 months ago

    In the same fashion that elves were like the best blacksmiths in middle earth, I love how furries specifically tend to be very high in the “computer power” scale

  • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 months ago

    I can’t help it but regardless of the context the phrase “Gay Furry Hackers” will always seem a little funny to me… Not sure why bain is a weird place.

    Let’s hope we hear about a lot more action from them.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      okay so sometimes living in a half passed shadow run 6e campaign run by severely concussed Kurt Vonnegut as he dies of dysentery is pretty fun.

      even in that condition; man can still write. apparently.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    “claim to have stolen 6200 dollars and spent it on 100 inflatable sea lions”

    Honestly, i’m not even sure this is a crime. Can you imagine being a juror in court for this shit?