• NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really want to live in the technologically-advanced, socialist utopia conservatives think mainstream Democrats are trying to produce

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know it opens doors we probably shouldn’t, but I’d have trouble declining a memory assistance implant.

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d go total replacement if it ever becomes viable. Full gradual-brain-replacement and completely robotic body. Probably too far out for anyone alive today, but we can hope. After all, at that point it’s just a roundabout way to immortality.

          • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The biggest issue is that memory isn’t stored in one location. There’s certain locations that index memories, but the memories themselves are all over the place. Even if we could replace an area of the brain with robotic components, it’s probably more efficient to promote neurogenesis and have damaged sections regrow. We might implant electrodes in the brain for additional functionality, but neurons are so efficient it’ll be a long time before we can improve upon them. Regrowing body parts will be preferable to replacing parts, and we’ll only add robotic components to augment biology.

            I think we’ll see biology used in computers more than we’ll see artificial parts replace biology. Researchers already use neurons to act as nodes in neutral networks with promising results.

            • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Agreed, but that depends on if we develop those biological modifications / replacement before artificial parts can do ‘good enough.’ I’d rather live in an OK robot or computer sim than die because the body couldn’t be replaced biologically. Although as you said, we won’t be improving on neurons anytime soon. But the rest can be replaced well enough to function.

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well when you can become a gender destroying cyborg just for not caring who uses what public bathroom, just like we do in our own homes, the sky becomes the limit for how cool you can be. Embrace it, you’re one cool cat.

  • LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weird to think everyone with a pacemaker, insulin pump, or cochlear implant is trans but hey, I don’t make the rules.

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait till you find out that almost no one has a gendered bathroom in their house, everyone is trans.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’s got a solid case, that part-human part-machine goal totally checks out with…Star trek.

    That fictional TV show star trek.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought it was on feminism to destroy gender norms. Like yeah most of us are militant feminists, but we can’t do this shit on our own

  • AssPennies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man, I guess the old GOP fallback bogeymen weren’t scary enough to their base, they had to go fabricate this shit. What a bunch of FUD.