What about a bot that automatically removes post/comments and bans people from other instances from the community?
A bisexual nonbinary poster of memes and other things • They/Any
What about a bot that automatically removes post/comments and bans people from other instances from the community?
Whenever you see a post. And remember when you post it shows you your post so you must post after you post.
They are just AC units in reverse. The biggest effect humidity is going to have is on how much condensation is going to form on the exterior radiator. That’ll form frost that’ll have to be melted in a defrosting cycle. That’ll decrease performance and efficacy. Low humidity should keep that to a minimum.
The fabled Blahaj cuddle pile.
Numbers going up does feel nice and a post not gaining any traction can be disappointing.
Nice thing about Lemmy is it is so small that local and global new feeds are actually usable. Even new communities with no subscribers can get plenty of views from those alone.
That’s exactly why it needs to be something you are willing to explain. It makes their stories better.
License changes that will charge developers based on how many installs their game has instead of how many units sold.
It seems that locally hosted images are down. That’ll be every uploaded image, thumbnails, profile image. Weird thing is that community icons and banners are still loading.
A YouTube channel called Truth and Foundation.
They’ll just keep giving you shots of Ambien until you stop.
From my understanding of how federation and communities work is that the instance hosting a given community receives the postal, comments and votes for that community from other instances and then sends the combined data out to other instances that requests that data. Users from instances that aren’t federated could still interact if they both used a community on a third party instance they were both federated with. But I could be wrong about all that.
And your right. Brigading is probably too strong of a word outside of evidence of coordinating action.
Now that I’ve looked at lemmy.world, beehaw and lemm.ee myself, you might be closer to right than I initially thought. The amount of comments in the first thread on the blocking instances, lemmy.world and beehaw, is much less than the federated instances, blahaj.zone and lemme.ee. The vote amounts on the blocking instances agree with each other and the amounts on the federated instances agree with each other.
I think that’s sufficient evidence to conclude something is up. I’m going to suspect lemmy.world and beehaw filtered out hexbear comments and votes when they federated the post. This would suggest brigading from hexbear users. But I would need to view the vote database to be sure.
I don’t think this is the proper way to do this analysis. I believe the lemmy.world vote counts should be the same as blahaj.zone. It will still include the votes from hexbear. The only difference would be that lemmy.world’s view will include the down votes from lemmy.world itself. Those won’t federate over to blahaj.zone since down voting is disabled on the instance.
It should be possible to do your analysis though. It will take getting a copy of the vote history for the comments on the post. Every admin of an instance that federates with blahaj.zone has a copy of that. Then you will have to run some queries on the database to filter votes by the instance they originate from.
Stop looking inside me. It’s mostly just meat.
This is the meta community. It’s actually called main song you’ll find it at [email protected]. Meta is being used here to mean discussions around blahaj.zone itself. The op wants discussions about blahaj.zone that happen in this community to be limited to members of the server and exclude those from others servers.
Ok I can see how that could make a drama thread worse.
Only other workaround I can think of is a setting up a second instance that only federates with blahaj.zone. But that wouldn’t show up on the local feed and there may be federation quirks im not aware of.