• matcha_addict@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not very clear to me that this is any more valuable than OG NixOS.

    This sounds a lot like the forgejo vs gitea fork. I love the forgejo people but I am yet to see a sufficient differentiator.

    • Mx Phibb@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the reason is because apparently a lot of people are unhappy with a deal Nix inked apparently with a company that does business with the US’ Immigrations and Customs

    • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/

      I dunno, some of these are a pretty big deal, in particular:

      Gitea repeatedly makes choices that leave Gitea admins exposed to known vulnerabilities during extended periods of time. For instance Gitea spent resources to undergo a SOC2 security audit for its SaaS offering while critical vulnerabilities demanded a new release. Advance notice of security releases is for customers only.

      Gitea is developed on github, whereas forgejo is developed on and by codeberg, who use it as their main forge (also mentioned on that page). Someone dogfooding gives me more confidence in the software.

    • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I like #Nix, I do not like what has happened to it.

      With no explanation of what happened, the conclusion is almost certainly Internal politics.

      It seems like forgejo split from gitea because it looked like gitea was going the route of gitlab. Idk if NixOS is going to commercialize though. Based on recent gossip it sounds like they’re overly adverse to commercialization. IE banning people for having DoD connections. Aux’s talk about special interest groups makes it sound like they’re going embrace that like redhat.