What can systemd do that cannot be done with OpenRC?
What can systemd do that cannot be done with OpenRC?
Two questions:
Sure, the alternative init systems don’t provide non init functionalities, but other software probably does.
Not how I understood it. Rather, there are alternatives that have potential to be better than systemd, but systemd has the unfair advantage of receiving the funding and manpower.
If alternatives had equal manpower, they may have had better success than systemd.
Don’t entirely discount a project only because it is funded by the US government. Do take that as a big yellow flag, but not auto reject. Better to just asses the project for what it is with caution.
I find it much more likely that the US government has a huge interest in giving the public access to secure communication software that would be unbreakable by surveillance from a typical government. Why? Because those are the governments that are enemies of the US, and where the US is interested in regime change. And the existence of this software is much more influential towards regime change in those countries, rather than being threat to the US.
In fact, these softwares are barely a threat to the US. The US has no issue with them existing because they have such a powerful hold on their state.
But they literally did. What Israel is doing is not new. The only thing new is media coverage.
Support for Israel is their choice and interest. They aren’t being held by the balls like you make it sound.
Can you please demonstrate how async workflows and monads resolve this issue?
Wouldn’t effect systems still be considered exceptions, but handled differently?
Macos has homebrew, which I think can do the same thing!
Do you use a package manager? It should take care of updating everything for you at once.
To each their own I guess, databases are ridiculously expensive when managed and I always self host.
A team? For what OP described, all you need is one person
My issue with it arises when data is not interpreted as I expected, like because of weird white space issues for example.
Human sexual dimorphism is a lot more minor than what most people assume.
This makes sense, but do you have any readings or evidence on the matter?
Unfortunately it is still not enough. There have been many instances of people using these licenses and still corporations using their software without giving back, and developers being upset about it.
And unfortunately there are no popular licenses that limit that. I’ve seen a few here and there, but doesn’t seem to be a standard.
Why only “with sufficient revenue”? All commercial use should pay. Adding “with sufficient revenue” only makes it more difficult to enforce and introduces loopholes.
It’s criminal the propaganda that lead people like this developer to believe they should do the work for free, and not worry, because the corporate world always gives back :)
That is part of why you’re not a tech CEO. You’re not supposed to have compassion! No investor would want that.
P.S. This is an attack on CEOs and investors, not on you :)
AGPL doesn’t help. AGPL authors are explicitly pro-corporate use
What’s the reason?
What does a programmer need?
This doesn’t seem to be something a distro can solve beyond making it possible to install this stuff.
Maybe the closest is nixos, because it allows a lot of flexibility in setting up different development environments that are fully reproducible. Gentoo is also close, as it allows the same but in a different way (without the extent of reproducible guarantees).