• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The judge is biased on the side of Justice. Getting the case thrown out out of principle wouldn’t help anyone but Trump.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s bullshit and you know it.

      There are established rules and procedures. When you fudge them on one side, to avoid appearing biased to the other….

      That is itself bias. against your “side of justice”.

      This judge is afraid of Trump; and in his fear making a mockery of justice. You know it, I know it, and Trump knows it. Even the judge knows it.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah so let’s treat him the same way as anyone else so he can use that as an excuse to stop the procedure against him, that will sure show him!

        Of all the cases where people want the judge to treat the accused the same way they would be treated in order to prove a point, this is probably the worst one.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That’s not how it works.

          You’re enabling Trump’s bullshit.

          It’s (stochastic) terrorism and you’re just like “but dude! It might not stick!”

          Wonder what you say when trump’s cultist kill off witnesses and jurors?

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re enabling Trump’s bullshit.

            No, this random commenter on Lemmy is absolutely not enabling Trump’s bullshit. We’re just trying to explain the behavior of the judge, we have nothing to do with it.

            It’s (stichadtic) terrorism and you’re just like “but dude! It might not stick!”

            Stochastic terrorism is, obviously, what they’re trying to avoid with the gag order. The judge and his family are already victims, and he knows full well that the jury and witnesses are at risk. No offense intended, but I suspect he understands the situation he’s in better than you do.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            So you would rather see him not face any consequences for the crime he has committed except for a weekend in jai, all out of principle?

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              So you’re okay with terrorism.

              Oh look, I can play that game too! The process is meant for the judge to be neutral. Any other position risks the validity of the trial.

              Your argument flies in the face of justice.