• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah so let’s treat him the same way as anyone else so he can use that as an excuse to stop the procedure against him, that will sure show him!

    Of all the cases where people want the judge to treat the accused the same way they would be treated in order to prove a point, this is probably the worst one.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s not how it works.

      You’re enabling Trump’s bullshit.

      It’s (stochastic) terrorism and you’re just like “but dude! It might not stick!”

      Wonder what you say when trump’s cultist kill off witnesses and jurors?

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re enabling Trump’s bullshit.

        No, this random commenter on Lemmy is absolutely not enabling Trump’s bullshit. We’re just trying to explain the behavior of the judge, we have nothing to do with it.

        It’s (stichadtic) terrorism and you’re just like “but dude! It might not stick!”

        Stochastic terrorism is, obviously, what they’re trying to avoid with the gag order. The judge and his family are already victims, and he knows full well that the jury and witnesses are at risk. No offense intended, but I suspect he understands the situation he’s in better than you do.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        So you would rather see him not face any consequences for the crime he has committed except for a weekend in jai, all out of principle?

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So you’re okay with terrorism.

          Oh look, I can play that game too! The process is meant for the judge to be neutral. Any other position risks the validity of the trial.

          Your argument flies in the face of justice.