This is quite exciting in that it removes plastic waste. I see no reason why different companies can’t make different shape ones to maintain their lock-in. I expect a knock-off market to pop-up, but that exists with plastic pods too. It’s a step in the right direction at least.

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes! We can finally buy our way out of unnecessary waste, and ultimately climate change, with this new thing that keeps us buying. Just gotta buy the ecological things and everything will be good.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Team Aeropress here.

    Good to see Keurig try to cut down on plastic waste, but if they really wanted to make an impact, they could open-source the design of the pods so all the alt-cup manufacturers could switch as well. It may be counter-intuitive, but the more options customers have, the more machine sales and goodwill Keurig will create.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I just use the resuable pods. Can throw any coffee grounds in them, dump them in the compost when done, rinse, and use again. Have used these for at least 5 years.

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This might be a really stupid question, but if you’re going to use reusable pods, why not just… Use a classic Mr. Coffee-style coffee maker that has been around for decades?

      • hoch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Because Jill in accounting has no clue how to make coffee, yet always gets to the coffee pot first.

        This see-through abomination was the final straw before I switched to using the office keurig.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The biggest area this will be a win in is offices. Areas where groups of different people with different tastes gather and can pick a coffee that’s better suited to their taste. Having reusable k pods is nice, but when people don’t frequently work in there, or don’t realize a keurig is available they might not have one. Although I V60 everyday so this has no real personal impact.

  • exothermic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Sustainable”

    Coffee can, single piece of packaging for months on end.

    Vs.

    K-cups, paper, dyes, increased packaging volumes, increased energy in production, increased raw materials, 6 month shelf life = increased trips to the store to purchase more. Sustainable /s

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, it’s a plant. You can grow it, and plenty of it is grown. It is objectively more sustainable than, say, coal or helium.

        • ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          How does the coffee get from where it’s grown and into the can? Where does the space to grow it come from?

          Also, what are you talking about? Helium’s uses are largely medical, which is pretty far up there on the list of things we can’t do without.

          Also, so what? These new coffee pods are also more sustainable than both helium and coal when you use whatever definition of sustainability you’re using

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just to be clear, it was always “finally” able to be sustainable - it just wasn’t profitable.

    Now that they’ve saturated the market with makers they can “finally” keep the profits rolling with something that kills the planet less.

  • amelore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For fast easy machine single-serve, get a machine that takes beans. They cost about three pod-machines but they’re worth it. The pod-machines are cheaper because they come with vendor lock-in for the pods, and they just profit more on those instead.

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not as convenient, but a moka pot makes the best single serving coffee I’ve experienced. You can get a small version for less than $30. It takes me less than 5 minutes to make a barista level cup, and even the more expensive coffee is going to cost less than 50 cents per serving.

      The only downside is the coffee is highly caffeinated–nearly espresso levels. So you’re forced to add water if you just want a “cup” of coffee and it’s more of an Americano-style. But the taste beats the shit out of drip or Keurig cups…imo.

      • bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve never been able to get good moka pot coffee, but I’ve gotten good aeropress and french press coffee. I’ve got friends who swear by their moka pot and they’ve served me some excellent coffee.

        French press, aeropress, and moka are all good ways to get single servings of coffee. It will always beat kuerig coffee, even freshly ground kuerig coffee.

        Unfortunately, french press coffee is often silty, but if you are drinking kuerig coffee, you are probably also drinking silty coffee.

        FYI, espresso has roughly the same level of caffeine as a cup of coffee per serving, granted a serving of espresso is a lot smaller than a cup of coffee.

        If you want some good coffee you can get somewhat cheaply in bulk, Cafe Zapatista is great, ethical, and you are supporting indigenous mayan communities in Chiapas 😊. I get 3 pound bags every other month. Just know the bag isn’t resealable.