she/they 🏳️‍⚧️

somewhat shy and typically private

i write software for work but I’m mostly here for fun

  • 0 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 10th, 2023
  • Shae@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoBlahaj Lemmy Meta@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Blahaj Lemmy Users - Downvote question
    35·
    1 year ago

    Is it possible to have no downvotes on Blahaj, but do have downvotes on federated communities?

    This would give Blahaj users the same perception of federated communities as other instances have and give us a safe space in Blahaj. It also means we can sort federated communities like normal and see what everyone else sees, while still having downvotes nonexistent in Blahaj communities.

    I’ve never really wanted downvotes in Blahaj, but I’ve worried about not having them for other instances. It feels like I’m not on a “level playing field” when I can be downvoted by others on a federated communities, but can’t downvote anything myself. I’m also worried that with downvotes = 1/5, it would result in a skewed perspective of federated communities if Blahaj sorts federated communities that way too.

    I don’t know what the code looks like (yet?) but I feel like denying downvotes only on local communities wouldn’t be a hard change to make.

    Edit: I also wouldn’t mind if downvotes were 1/5 on Blahaj but 1=1 on federated communities, but I can see that being a harder change to make.

    Edit 2: if this is a straightforward change I wouldn’t mind implementing it when I have time. I have some familiarity with Rust, TS, and JS so it wouldn’t be difficult to jump into.

  • Shae@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•What kinds of things from reddit would you like to see Lemmy avoid as the user base grows?
    2·
    1 year ago

    This is a good point, and it lead me to a realization: on reddit, there are two crowds that don’t get the joke. The first is the people the sarcasm makes fun of. The second is people on your side that just really love correcting people. Treating you like you’re serious is a chance to correct you and gain community approval for how “right” they are. They miss the sarcasm because they’re so excited to correct someone and gain community approval for it.

    This isn’t a problem in real life: you know who you’re around, and you make sarcastic jokes when everyone around you knows your stance already. I can see why /s became a sort of necessary protection on reddit. We can hope to not have to protect ourselves from people like that here, and not need /s as a result.