I’ve been hearing ads for AI writing code for companies, I bet that has something to do with this.
I make art that’s totally mine because I did it through AI. https://imgur.com/a/Rhgi0OC
I’ve been hearing ads for AI writing code for companies, I bet that has something to do with this.
Have you heard of “sexy indifference”? A relative of mine mentioned it. It kind of makes sense. If you don’t seem desperate or greedy for a relationship, you’ll be more fun to be around and won’t care as much either, because you have your own thing going on.
The shots didn’t get anywhere near him, he is not a victim. Maybe all of the R’s can now go to golf clubs in solidarity with him. It would be way better than wearing a maxipad on their ears.
As detailed in the complaint, the defendants’ alleged scheme has three main components. First, an agreement to fix the price of peer review services at zero that includes an agreement to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the defendants’ preeminent journals.
Second, the publisher defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time, which substantially reduces competition by removing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly.
Third, the publisher defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year. As the complaint notes, “From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendant grants permission. Moreover, when the Publisher
I think that’s an honest mistake. She was awarded the Women’s Grandmaster title and the International Master which is confusing unless you look at the standards. It’s arguably a world title holder? Maybe? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorsa_Derakhshani
I’m guessing you do subscribed as well. I’ve also found it kind of nice to be able to leave and get on with my day. Reddit used to suck me in.
Are you checking for hot, 6 hours and 12 hours? I think it defaults to active which does make it seem, ironically, less active.
I think it depends on what you disagree with. If one is promoting going after our neighbors, hunting them down and killing them? Yeah, defederate. If another is Meta trying to take over the federation. Yeah, I vote defederate. If one thinks Hawaiian pizza is a travesty and the other doesn’t, hold your horses.
Treating everyone equally as well as accepting people for who they are, which are both antithetical to the progressive worldview, are core tenets of the Christian faith, and I’ve been a Christian for nearly as long as I can remember
Not sure I understand what you’re saying, I think you’re implying that you’re more Christian than anyone because you’re antiwoke? Woke just means that you honor everyone’s history. That seems pretty old school Christian to me. Ya know, the golden rule and all.
Yikes man, when did you go antiwoke? That’s a weird space I don’t get. I’ve never met an antiwoke person that wasn’t really, really racist. I’m not around them long.
But I think it’s also fair to point out that most anti-woke people don’t use slurs at all.
Hmmm, do you know a lot of antiwoke people or you just don’t use slurs? That’s a weird statement.
There are native, rain, discovery and pollinator gardens that you could do. It all takes time and money, but it’s a choice not a need. They’re all super popular in the PNW.
Well this is kind of funny that this came up soon after our convo:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a61937459/scientists-found-dark-electrons-in-solid-matter/
Working there? Sometimes there’s no choice. Buying anything there? Definitely a choice.
If you know it’s a process, then why would you criticize science for changing theories in response to new evidence?
Why aren’t you open to not knowing everything and that our knowledge could change?
The “God particle” is the Higgs boson. They found it with the LHC.
Right, the fermi lab peeps were skeptical about ever finding it. LHC proved it. You’re making my case.
This tells me you don’t just not know how science works; you don’t understand what science is.
Do you? It’s a process of finding out. Have you proven that stones don’t have an energy that we don’t have the equipment to measure? The black and white in this thread is now becoming funny while spouting that you believe in the process.
I’m having a hard time with this. We don’t know what we don’t know and it takes a lot of undeserved confidence to say anything is for sure. Fermilab never found the god particle and we’re pretty sure that exists. I’m not saying it’s true, but you guys are being a little over confident. Think about all of the theories and hypothesis that have been altered or completely changed over time.
Could someone explain what this means to non-techy people?