Is this AI generated? The man’s left arm appears to have a right hand. And the hoze he’s holding isn’t attached to anything.
Not to mention the face of the kid.
That’s not a kid, that’s a small bureaucrat.
This is a reshare from another site… and I think you’re right. Oops. Sorry.
I think you’re right. The hose has a long ass power washer attachment and he’s watering the coil of hose. Doesn’t make any sense to my human eyeballs.
It’s coming out of his pants.
It’s not a hose.
The arms are also significantly different sizes/colors on the adult.
The kid is doing a weird sort of forward lean, and has too big of a head.
The kids face is also a mixture of Zorro and Wesley from A princess bride
AI slop
Just a reminder (yet again) that the world is bigger than the US. I live in the UK, we don’t water our lawns here. Grass will grow literally anywhere with no human involvement. Letting your lawn grow a little longer is great for wildlife - the bees love the clover! In you live in the countryside get a sheep/cow/goat/donkey/llama and you’ll feed livestock without having to mow it either.
That said, fuck leaf blowers. There is absolutely no need for that noise.
lawns have always been elitist “look at how much land i have to waste on useless grass, you peasants” bullshit
and yes, HOAs are bullshit too, and to the “i don’t have a choice” people, if you’re not actively taking steps to change your situation to a no-HOA one, then you’re literally making the choice to continue to deal with it
may have been, but nowadays it’s just something you need, if you don’t want the kids ploughing through your pumpkins, trampling the strawberries and don’t want them playing on the street either. it’s not like you can’t do anything on the lawn.
There are native, rain, discovery and pollinator gardens that you could do. It all takes time and money, but it’s a choice not a need. They’re all super popular in the PNW.
I’m a big “fuck lawns” person, but I still have a small patch of grass* for playing, lounging, and other “foot traffic” activities. However it’s no larger than I need it to be, and the rest of my yard is covered in native/pollinator/volunteer plants or vegetable garden.
I don’t blame people for having a grass lawn to play on, but front lawns? Side walkways? Little strips next to the street, fence, or driveway? Funny corner spot that’s three square feet? No one is playing catch or sunbathing or otherwise utilizing the grass in these spaces.
*It’s not even 100% grass, as there’s a lot of clover, self-heal, moss, and other “weeds” interspersed. As long as it wouldn’t hurt to step on barefoot, I leave it be.
AI aside, this is kind of a dumb argument to make. And yes I get it’s a meme, but the point it making is still stupid.
Plants can have value other than just as a food source. There’s nothing wrong with cultivating decorative flowers, shrubs, or trees. By this argument everyone should have a small garden or farm yard else they’re wasting time/resources, ignoring that garden/farm plants may require more time and resources to raise and care for.
Lawns do serve a purpose other than just looking nice as well. In many areas if you don’t have a lawn, you’ve got a dust and dirt flying everywhere when the wind picks up.
Either way, the argument should be more in favor of native plants and wildflowers if it was to make a better point. Not to say there aren’t also native grasses out there.
Lawns are useless… and even the dust ring thing you mentioned can be avoided by many different means (including growing anything local, not a lawn)
The point is clear, lawns are expensive and useless features for a house. Considering the resources spent on them, there are a multitude of better options, even if those options are not edible
There’s a phrase: food not lawns. It’s usually used for promoting growing produce at home, but I think the concept needs a slight expansion: food or habitat, for people or animals. You mention decorative flowers, shrubs, and trees: there are many species of these that feed or shelter wildlife, so many in fact that it’s not in any way difficult to exclusively plant these over ones that don’t in most settings and climates.
In other words, there are plenty of “productive” uses of yard space other than food production for human consumption, of course. But I like this comic because I like the question posed (when expanded a bit): if we’re actively cultivating a plant, rather than leaving the space wild (where it could feed and shelter wildlife) and it’s not for us to eat, and wildlife can’t eat it or shelter in it either, then what are we doing?
That guy has his hands on backwards
HOA rules, son.
Doesn’t seem to be growing.
Indeed, the man is painting the grass green.
