That guys’ as well.
That guys’ as well.
Just try, what is the worst that could happen? Hehe-- [sound of breaking bones and rupturing organs]
Oni would be great, problem is the rights to it are split between like five different studios and it’s effectively abandoned. It’s why it’s not on GOG, Steam, etc.
Possibly the same situation for Attack of the Saucerman. Dayum.
It also wouldn’t surprise me if the source code has been completely lost, meaning there’s no chance of an HD upscale or anything.
Oh well, realistically, an upscale and a few improvements wouldn’t have cut it anyway.
Yet I think that had Judaism been more proselytist, it would have gained more followers and, probably, been more fanatical and aggressive.
Yes, that’s what I’m counting on, since I assume that ideas like religions take part in a long-term process of evolution. Unfortunately, the most whackiest, edgiest religions seem to be the most fit. Therefore my answer to the top level post.
I never said brainwashing children was ok as far as I can recall.
Fair enough, you didn’t. I apologize. I lost track of the chain of posters and mixed you up with the first poster who didn’t seem to recognize the dangers of passing belief to children.
As for Judaism, I stand by what I said: it’s not proselytist in the way other religions are, trying to convert other people. I don’t judge it as bad or as good, I don’t care. I just state a fact as I’ve seen/read.
That may be case. Which is possibly why, historically speaking, Judaism doesn’t seem to be on the winning side. Which is bad, because it means opportunities for more fanatical, agressive religions.
That’s not proselytising, it’s a while different thing
I don’t see your point. How is brainwashing children ok when wololo-ing people is not? Even from an egocentric perspective, you have to live in a society.
Pretty sure you can be born into judaism, though. Chances are, it is even the default scenario with even semi-religious parents.
That’s not “keeping to yourself” to me. That’s like passing the cigarettes to your kids.
If religious can keep to themselves
Since religions compete, that doesn’t sound feasible.
On second though, it doesn’t seem like a big improvement. Reminds me a bit of limbfeeders without limbs.
This, it would be less deep in the uncanny valley without eyes at all.
Git, probably
Please clarify, OP, did you mean
?
Indeed. Makes it more work to filter the handful of good or even great articles from the 99.99% that use this platform for its apparent ease of money grubbing.
It’ll probably take Valhalla for me, personally.
I sure hope so, but I’m not overly optimistic tbh. The market is basically considered medical, therapeutic devices. It is as you imagine, probably worse. It isn’t easy to find prices directly, but the only way this range of vendors continues to exist in this niche market is to sell devices with the complexity of a keyboard for four to five digits. There is no competition worth talking about happening.
So unless very specific regulation takes place, I don’t see standardized access to braille displays happening.
Right, that is another item I wished more editors would have picked up. Besides - say - nested language modes.
Original poster is right by all accounts, of course. Now, let’s come up with exotic significant indentations.
function xyz(a, b):
| var x = 2
| if true:
| | do_something()
| else:
| | do_something_else()
| anyway()
Pro: Your editor no longer needs to implement indentation hints.
Con: Looks obstructive if not highlighted like an indentation hint.
Your turn.
I’m glad it doesnt.