The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X::The former Twitter is incentivizing violent content, which will only become worse to stand out to users.

  • TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    259
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then stop already. Stop mentioning the name. Stop posting articles about it. Stop sharing articles about it on other social media.

    You know what’s immoral? Posting ragebait articles about a platform because you know users will engage.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      133
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I dunno’, kinda’ sounds similar to, “racism would be over if you’d just shut up about it.”

      X and Elon don’t magically disappear because you choose to ignore them.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it would be similar to that if racism was a business that survived based on engagement.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean… Isn’t it? Racism is very self-perpetuating. Especially when it’s allowed over other forms of distasteful speech.

          • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think so. Racism being self perpetuating means it will exist even if we stop talking about it and will probably just be worse because even well meaning folk can be racist if they’re not aware of it.

            X on the other hand stops existing if we stop sending it traffic and just let it die.

        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you think it isn’t, you clearly haven’t been paying attention to all of racism in general and hypercapitalist neofascism in particular.

      • marswarrior@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        If everyone shuts up about racism, then racism will be worse. If everyone stopped talking about twitter, then twitter will die. It’s not the same thing at all. Not even close.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are mixing “talking about Twitter” with “being on Twitter”. If nobody on Lemmy or Mastodon said a single word about Twitter ever again… it would still outnumber them by hundreds of millions users. I don’t like it, but that’s still how it is. But consequently, ragging on it is not going to recruit people who left for the Fediverse.

          But if you mean making everyone on Twitter to shut up in general, well, easier said than done.

            • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes overall but even then it’s not so cut and dry. Think of, say, queer artists who depends on this to have a living, or minority activists who need it to be heard, to push back against the same hate spreading across it. If they simply up and leave before building up an audience elsewhere they’ll just end up worse for it. For activists, even if they have other platforms, they still consider what will happen in the wider picture if a major platform like this is left to bigotry and toxicity unchallenged, and those who aren’t bothered by it.

              Sometimes taking the moral high ground is a luxury. Given the way some people criticize the irony of minorities who still rely on it, I don’t think they really get how complicated the matter is.

            • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah. That doesn’t make a bit of sense, that’s stretching those generalizations to the breaking point. How is talking negatively of it going to make it more appealing to people who already left mainstream social media out of dissatisfaction. Who do you think this person is who’s like “I had enough of Twitter, but now that they said it’s vile and falling apart I absolutely must go back there”?

              Even if the average person on Facebook could vaguely feel interested in it as a talking point, which is already a strange logic, here it doesn’t seem likely or meaningfully impactful.

      • alianne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference is that racists are usually racist due to a moral stance, not because it makes them money; ignoring them means we’ll hear about it less but it won’t actually go away. Clickbait/ragebait, on the other hand, isn’t a moral viewpoint - it’s meant to bring a person money via exposure/engagement, so less engagement leads to less money which leads to less bait because it’s no longer working.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dunno’, you’d find plenty of economic justification if you go back and read why the confederacy got started. Or why Germany went a little crazy in early 1900’s…

          While it is correct to logically dismiss the actual arguments of rage bait, it is purely foolish to pretend that it has no tangible effects worth counteracting all the same.

          To say these things aren’t even worth talking about in general is akin stepping aside for bad actors to take over.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Corporate deadnaming is the only good deadnaming.

          Facebook also only deserves to be called Meta as a reminder that they rebranded into a failed trend and lost billions because of it.

      • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dunno. Racism isn’t entirely manifested by one man. He’s just one more bucket of piss in a sea of piss. Fuck him. We can at any time choose to ignore him. Choose to ignore his shit app. He doesn’t matter to any equation, he’s just an annoying rich person struggling with their addiction to child pornography. Wups did I say the silent part out loud. Shit.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What you say is completely correct for engaging with his platform.

          Not about not talking about the rise of bigoted morons in general. That is sticking your head in the sand.

      • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well kinda, except for these articles that pop now and then in my timeline, I haven’t heard of XformerlyTwitter for a while.

        It was fun for a few weeks, joking about what bulls**t idea Musk had during the weekend with colleagues, but after a while the joke was a bit repetitive.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not news because he joked about it. It’s news because he’s flippantly doing it with production.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        While some of the same words appear in these two things, they are nothing alike.

        The debate over whether recognizing racism can help us eliminate it has nothing to do with an unhinged billionaire who uses shock tactics to generate PR, and the bottom-feeding publications who give it to him by stoking our disgust.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, it’s very much similar. You’re saying don’t even talk about it, when the article is about how it is a corrupted service. A service that at least used to have global reach. If a service is a globally used resource, it’s kinda’ institutionalized.

          Since when did ignoring institutionalized injustice ever fix it? Never. It never gets fixed in the dark.

          I understand the concept of not feeding trolls, but do not misjudge and accidentally ask people to ignore villains.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s a corrupted service, therefore it’s a service, therefore it’s an institution, therefore it’s institutionalized injustice….

            Feeling a little loose after all that stretching? I guess the policies of every website company in the world now constitute institutionalized injustice. I’ll use that phrase next time I’m appealing the Facebook modbot.

            I wouldn’t say we should never talk about Twitter and it’s impact on our world. I will say it is a media circus which is paraded about far, far too often to its corrupt owners benefit. And it needs to have less attention than it is getting like a fire needs less air.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Way to treat an association as an exact replica… I’m trying to put bread crumbs down, not rope them together. Stop pretending you do not know what an alegory is.

              If you understand the general topic should not be shunned … why are you speaking on behalf of shunning it?

              • scarabic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I answered that. Last paragraph. Stop spinning wild extrapolations out of your ass for a second and just read some hard text.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What the hell are you talking about? Acknowledging that black people and other minorities have had a hard time in the past that leads to present continued struggle IS NOT racism… It’s acknowledging reality.

          What IS racist is saying the behavior is innate to the race, not that minorities have consequently received the short end of the economic stick.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you cannot understand the difference between recognizing the past hardships people in general have faced and continue to face and making assumptions about specific people you don’t know … you are literally too stupid to understand racism or privilege. Congratulations on being pathetically stupid.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get your point that major media outlets constantly talking about them is empowering them, but pretending that Lemmy talking about it has any effect whatsoever is vastly overestimating how consequential this place is.

          I know a lot of people here are just sick to hear of the matter but lets not pretend that not talking about it is a moral stance.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is a sight to behold. There is a certain class of people that don’t know who they are without Twitter because they measure their worth in followers and whatever influence that brings them. They are definitely going through all the stages of grief. Many of those types work in the media, hence all the articles hemming and hawing about whether to stay on Twitter or not.

      For those of us that don’t have our egos entangled with the site, the writing was on the wall pretty early on. Twitter, or X, is dead and not worth our time. I’m sure those of us on Lemmy are especially capable of sniffing out the moment a social network turns sour.

    • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ironically by you commenting on this, and further by me commenting on your comment, we have added to the metrics and it has now been deemed that it’s more popular because more people are talking about it. That’s the actuality.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back before Apollo was killed I had the words “Elon” and “Trump” filtered out. I just never saw these rage posts in the first place. Man, I’d love to see that feature in a Lemmy client. Anyone know if it exists?

    • Marruk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Posting ragebait articles about a platform because you know users will engage.

      Lol irony.

  • Shazbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is your daily reminder to engage and boost Twitter alternatives such as Mastodon. It’s not enough to ignore Twitter. We must build communities to draw in users, show them social media can exist without Elon or Zuck. Only when good alternatives exist, with content and people sought after, do users feel safe to abandon old platforms.

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I made a burner to see for myself after using it for work a few years ago. It’s a complete dumpster fire now, way worse than before. Bots and shitty animated gambling ads everywhere. Porn bots and scammers are trying to follow you every 2 seconds. Elon’s dipshit musings/ragebait are forced into your feed even when you block him. Any tweets you make get zero engagement. remaining accounts are either bots, racists, fascists, or creators and celebrities moaning and/or hemming and hawing about leaving all the time because muh ego. It’s not even worth witnessing the spectacle.

    It’s also fucking straight up broken half the time. Mastodon is a breath of fresh air in comparison even pre-Elon. Wish more would use it.

    • havokdj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The forced elon spam reeks of insecurity. I thought the whole reason behind being extremely rich was not giving a fuck about what the world thinks, yet here we are.

      • Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A couple people I know dumped their teslas because they didn’t want to support the nazi.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never used Twitter, but X has never been better—250+mg per pill, that’s three times what it was in the early 00s!

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we all just boycott anything having to do with Musk/Twitter? I just want a browser extension that will automatically prevent me from going to a site that has any sort of links or anything related to twitter. Your blog also links to your Twitter account? Fuck you, I’m not reading it. Your news story references a tweet from somebody? Fuck you I’m not reading it. Your Lemmy post talks about Musk or Twitter? Fuck you, I’m not reading it. I just want all mention of Musk or Twitter or X completely erased from the internet. It may unfortunately impact any reference to anything else ‘X’ related, but that’s a small price to pay for a Musk-free life.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are lots of browset extensions that can block any site you want to block. I use Block Site on Firefox but there’s plenty to choose from, just have a search.

    • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even better idea, everyone order a starlink then do a return. Will temp cost you $300 but free return shipping at spacex expense

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        SpaceX is an amazing company. I don’t want to punish SpaceX.

        It’s less than a quarter the cost to get to space now, because of SpaceX

    • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, basically you want to stick your head in the sand and pretend things aren’t happening.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I’d rather read about the important things that are happening. Twitter is not important and the only thing that will finally get all these other companies to finally drop twitter is if it starts hurting their bottom line and reduces clicks and reads. If there’s a coordinated campaign to block Twitter, it could finally just remove it from the internet.

  • Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I joined Twitter fairly recently as Machine Learning Twitter is/was a thing, and I wanted to stay abreast of news from people like Andrej Karpathy, Chris Olah, Andrew Ng etc., especially since r/MachineLearning went down the shitter.

    But I can’t even - I log on and just instantly see ragebait posts from Daily Mail talking heads and bullshit.

    Are there any better alternatives for this purpose?

      • Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you know of a better ML related instance than sigmoid.social let me know, but none of those influential figures I mentioned post there, and the discussion is pretty much non-existent.

    • Danakin@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If there are better alternatives entirely depends on how active those people are on Mastodon, Bluesky or even Threads. (Not sure on activity on Bluesky, as I haven’t got an invite yet…)

      I’m a PHP developer, many people (but not all) in the community crosspost on Twitter and Mastodon, so Mastodon is a good alternative for me personally.

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lead by example. At least stop pretending that this news article/opinion piece belongs in a technology.

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fediverse provides an alternative for people who care about using ethical products. Haven’t tried threads/bluesky but they seem like more of the same. Unfortunately I don’t think people care about the ethics of their micro-blogging platform; their biggest priority is having the largest soap box to shout from.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure I’d call lemmy ethical considering how much genocide denial there is.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you missed the part where the person you are replying to is talking about the ethics of the platform itself, not the ethical viewpoint of the users using the platform nor the personal views of the developers.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy isn’t one entity. It’s several different websites. That would be like calling Linux unethical because some people use it for weapons research… it’s open source, so people can do whatever they want with it. Douglas Crockford famously added "“The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil” to the license for JSON, but it was determined by various people to be unenforceable and not compatible with free software licensing.

    • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy just seems like a big echo chamber of tech, Linux, and Political news. Maybe some memes sprinkled in, but little else.

  • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone here actually use it? I literally never made an account

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have an account that I use exclusively to DM companies for support. I found out that I can get help quicker and more easily than going through their website or call center hoops.

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know a lot of people relying on it for sharing research papers and finding them. It’s depressing to not have an alternative.

  • orwellianlocksmith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn, this is actually quite compelling. I knew X/Twitter was bad, but didn’t realize just how bad it has become. Thanks for posting.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Downvote Musk spam.

    The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring him and his businesses stay in the headlines every day. Don’t be a useful idiot.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That says so much about u that animal torture is ok but don’t they dare demand $8 from u.

        • nik0@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh no im not saying that about myself. left a long time ago when he started rate limiting and funding right leaning mfs. I’m just trying to imagine wby people stay on a service like that. I kinda hope elon starts charging for twitter so when i see who actually pays for it, its gonna be much easier to cut them off.