• magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    If a trail is off limits to motorized vehicles, then it’s off limits to motorized vehicles. That should be the end of the discussion.

    If someone thinks the laws are unfair and should be changed, then they should fight to change those laws. The worst thing they can do is be a smug asshole who thinks they’re justified in breaking the law because their motorized vehicle is “different”.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Legally, an ebike absolutely can be distinct from being a motor vehicle despite having a motor (at least in some places in the US).

        • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          There’s no overarching federal law firmly regulating it, just guidelines, so actual laws can vary from state to state but generally speaking, they tend to be legally distinct from the term motor vehicle as long as they fall under the class 1-3 ebike, otherwise, they probably would consider it an unlicensed motor vehicle of some kind.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean, for serious - let’s have a discussion here.

    Where is the line at which allowing motocross bikes ride in public parks is problematic, but letting ebikes on them isn’t?

    • crawancon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      noise/fumes from one and the ability to go faster than 40? there’s a line in there somewhere that feels reasonable.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        How about weight and destructiveness in power terms? Ebikes have a lot of low end torque that is capable of destroying nature. They shouldn’t be on nature trails. Just the bike itself is about 3x heavier than a normal bike, and even the capability of going 25mph - they shouldn’t be allowed.

            • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Hoofs absolutely wreck the trails. I freguently ride on trails that people ride horses on and those are among the worst one to ride. They literally carve ditches on the forest floor.

        • crawancon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I am on board with coming up with these lines. I’d say though that my wife’s normal bike is 50 lbs and my ebike is 60. but a weight line, I don’t know - is 100lbs it? when I made my comment I was thinking of “e-motorbikes” vs ebikes, thinking the power for motorbikes would be too much.

          it’s a fair point about speed - perhaps setting speed limits in parks could be enforced, (not sure) or park Rangers could determine bike validity based on power but there seems to be ways to fake that or change dynamically.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          In Finland and most of EU ebikes with 250W motor and speed limited to 25kph (15mph) are clasified as bicycles and you’re allowed to ride those where ever you are allowed to ride bikes aswell. However motorized vehicles (not pedal assist) you’re not allowed to ride anywhere except public roads or private property with permission so even a Surron with a 250W motor and limited to 25kph but no pedals would be off-limits.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      The UK defines it as up to 250W and not providing motor support over 15mph. Exceed those limits and it becomes a motorbike.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That seems reasonable. Unfortunately in the US, the thought process is BIGGER BIGGER BIGGER on everything. I wouldn’t be surprised at some point if you couldn’t get a 250w bike in the coming years :D

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a question of how powerful they are, motocross bikes can easily reach speeds that would be fatal if they hit a pedestrian.

      E bikes, while they can potentially kill someone, are much slower.

  • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why’s this read like satire? Also I looked up the bike they have and it looks only a bit heavier than a mountain bike, so what’s the beef? Just because it kicks out more power than a mountain bike can?

    If this isn’t satire then I agree the kid’s an asshole but it just seems like we’re splitting hairs here about the usage, this type of bike should be allowed on both types of trails depending on the limitation reasons of each trail.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      How much is a bit?

      Also, putting down more power than a mountain bike can would definitely fuck up the terrain more than a mountain bike would even if they weighed the same.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      The noise may also be an issue for local wildlife compared to a mountain bike. Some are loud enough that’s it’s like running a vacuum cleaner.