Those seem incompatible to me.

(UBI means Universal Basic Income, giving everyone a basic income, for free)

  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I can manage financially with 2 days of work a week, and I’m now at a point where I would not want to scale back because my work would become of lower quality. Every Monday would be like coming back from a vacation, and I think I’d lose touch and feel with the job.

    Those 5 days weekend sure give me time for personally enriching hobbies!

    • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Society couldn’t function if most people worked like you. I’m happy for you and it’s the exact place I want to be but I think its only possible in our current framework.

        • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Also, a fair bit of work is work for the sake of work. It doesn’t enrich society, just the capitalism machine. So if UBI were enacted on a large scale, there is plenty of unnecessary work that can go by the wayside.

      • moriquende@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It actually could. Imagine if salary had increased in accordance to the productivity boosts that automation has brought. Then you could have 3 people, working 2 days a week, sharing a job and being able to live from it. After all, it used to take more than 3 people to do the work a single person does nowadays.