• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    That’s 3 countries and Palestine, which is also a country in my book.

    “Defense”

      • Berserker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        What will the USA and Israel do? Bomb them to death and? Invade? Without an army in the ground you can’t really win. Which of their lackeys can they send, the turks? The saudis? Good luck with that.

        • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Take out the Iranian regime that’s holding their country hostage and Iranians will do the rest themselves.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    The Zionist regime is a rogue state. It threatens the security of mankind.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Will not, world war cost a lot for the country involved, this might just be another regional war and proxy war combined.

          • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            I mean yeah, democratic decline, dwindling ressources and climate change are putting the world on a path to a lot more conflict. This is going to be the new normal going forward if we don’t manage to stop the underlying problems. Doesn’t mean there will be a massive world war, but it definitely means there will be more significant wars.

  • SaltSong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    Are they running out of people to murder in Gaza? Or do they just need someone to fight back, so they can look oppressed?

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      The moment they stop fighting is the moment they have to collectively come to terms with what they have done as a nation. Netanyahoo has to keep it going.

    • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      The US is obligated by law, to keep sending them weapons in order to maintain a “qualitative military edge” against all potential threats. This unfortunately incentivizes Israel to maintain a high threat level, in order to increase the amount of weapons it receives.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        “By law”. It’s just a convenient excuse for genocidal immorality. It’s not like words on paper matter to anyone in power in the West, you’d definitely be blind to think otherwise.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          You had me in the first sentence; not gonna lie. The second one, though, just goes off the rails.

        • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          “The West” is a bit too broad don’t you think.

          I think that’s blinkered, if not blind. Definitely.

          And that username… (edit: oh look they just changed it from “ArgumentativeMonotheist” to “YappyMonotheist”)

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        obligated by law, to keep sending them weapons

        Can you expand on that?

        There are agreements but to which extent are they binding? I guess they are not unconditional.

        • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          This explains it in better detail than I could. It isn’t so much a single law, but rather a lot of different laws that all work together to ensure that Israel is given everything it could possibly need for its own defense…even bypassing normal regulatory measures in the process, as long as certain conditions are maintained.

          Israel has invested tens of millions of dollars lobbying for, and helping to write, the legislation that guarantees their continuous access to weapons. A lot of it is written directly into defense spending bills that are essential for domestic defense spending as well. So, without a massive shift in policy at the legislative level to disentangle those priorities, that support is legally binding.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Neither. Internal politics in Israel threatened to break up the government, and starting a war with Iran was the easiest way to stop that. Can’t break up the government now, we’re in a state of emergency!

      Bibi would sooner burn down all of Israel than step down from power.

  • BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Crazy that within just a couple weeks Ukraine and now Israel have successfully smuggled drones into a country. Terrifying new vector of war.

  • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    “They have backed up their genocidal rhetoric with a program to develop nuclear weapons.”

    Netanyahu’s not in the best position to accuse others of genocidal rhetoric backed up with powerful weaponry.

      • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I think I don’t like war. Period.

        I can realistically understand the reasons given for it, but that’s never going to make me like it.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Trump started all this shit when he ruined the last nuclear deal in his first term.

    He sure is great at fucking everything up, and sowing chaos.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Here are the global knock-on effects of Trumpism. The world has been afraid of this for years. And mind you, it’s not because the USA is losing its grip, its role of world police. It’s because of fucked-up diplomacy dominated by egomania, backing the wrong allies in the wrong way. And being so dumb that you’re easily exploitable.

    I’m sorry for once again seeing every conflict through USian eyes - Americans do that well enough by themselves - but in this case it’s just true. Fuck Trump, Fuck Netanyahu. Let’s hope this nightmare ends soon.


    From the article:

    A U.S. official told CNN that the United States had no involvement or assistance in the Israeli strikes

    Um, sure. No involvement at all during the last 8 decades.

    And Netanyahu:

    “This is a clear and present danger to Israel’s very survival. 80 years ago the Jewish people were the victims of a holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi regime. Today, the Jewish state refuses to be a victim of a nuclear holocaust, perpetrated by the Iranian regime.”

    ‌ Of course they stick to that one however nonsensical it has become, considering Israel is the Nazi regime now, inflicting its own holocaust on others.