A photograph of Trump administration official Mike Waltz’s phone shows him using an unofficial version of Signal designed to archive messages during a cabinet meeting.

Mike Waltz, who was until Thursday U.S. National Security Advisor, has inadvertently revealed he is using an obscure and unofficial version of Signal that is designed to archive messages, raising questions about what classification of information officials are discussing on the app and how that data is being secured, 404 Media has found.

On Thursday Reuters published a photograph of Waltz checking his mobile phone during a cabinet meeting held by Donald Trump.

The screen appears to show messages from various top level government officials, including JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and Marco Rubio.

  • Fingolfinz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    Let your local magats know how you feel about being subjected to this shit show daily. Really let them know how you feel.

  • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “We are currently clean on OPSEC.”

    “Only the best people.”

    These fucking clowns. I’ve lived through an awful lot of Gov’t by the Stupid…

    (Remember when we thought Bush the Younger was the dumbest president ever…??)

    But this freak show simply outdoes anything that came before. 🙄 🤡 🖕

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    Could it be that Mike was the insider that was leaking stuff to the media and this archiveable version of Signal is to be able to prove and/or keep Signal conversations that would otherwise be removed from the official app? I mean, just them using Signal is a violation of the Records Act, no, due to the ability to remove entire chats after a period of time? Everyone thinks he’s incompetent or dumb, but he may have added that reporter on purpose to expose their use of Signal in the first place and he’s using this unofficial version to save chats we would otherwise not have record of. If the insider info stops now, we’ll know why.

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Laws don’t usually center around ability to do something but actually doing it. That is, using signal may be fine, turning on disappearing messages isn’t. But you can’t know. Most of our system is built on trust, assuming that people who got to that level, passed clearance, etc…are worthy of our trust. On the other hand, what’s even the alternative?

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    7 days ago

    So these convos are backed up somewhere. Outside of government control. Great.

    No wonder they moved fast to block any investigation

    • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Noooo, it’s not that they’re guilty of anything… it’s to protect from the deep state and the radical left commiefascist"insertbuzzword"s! I’d put “hey look at the bunny” but these assholes aren’t even trying to distract anymore, it’s just plain and simple corrupt government running for their own best interests while throwing out half hearted stupid sound bites to appease the brain washed.

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s backed up to the Israeli software company that makes this unofficial version of Signal. Probably the only people it’s less safe with than the Russians.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        i think mossad has work with russia in the past, and they would likely get thier hands on this, and russia can pass it on to iran who will leak it to Hamas,etc.

  • Vytle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yo this is a real interesting read but the title is straight clickbait that makes it seem like the gov’t is externally archiving signal messages for citizens.

        • piecat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          No i mean, are they not just storing encrypted messages until they have capability to decrypt?

          • 60d@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes, the US government has a longstanding ‘grab everything’ order in place.

            It’s just a matter of whether they want to put the resources towards deciphering something.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I read it as intented, since most headlines in the last month have been about their own usage of Signal.

  • clonedhuman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 days ago

    The article makes me wonder if Waltz is intentionally countering the counter-revolution.

    Either that, or he’s just stupid as fuck.

    Maybe both.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Lemme get this straight

    It’s a problem for the government to use signal because all govt correspondence needs to be on record and retrievable in the future

    But it’s also a problem to use archiving of encrypted chats?

    Not an American, can someone explain?

    • clonedhuman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes.

      The answer is that this is all a bunch of stupid bullshit and that the Trumplicans truly don’t give a damn about laws that no one can force them to follow.

      At this point, there’s really no point in trying to look for consistency or rational justification for anything these people do.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        What laws are being broken? If republicans control both houses, why don’t they approve the app or change the law?

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 days ago

          Government communications must be archived.

          The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities. 44 U.S. Code § 3101.

          By using Signal, they’re intentionally breaking the law since Signal doesn’t retain communications. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is they don’t want a record so they can’t be held accountable in the future.

          If republicans control both houses, why don’t they approve the app or change the law?

          The simple answer is that this wouldn’t pass the Senate, because the filibuster still exists (for now) and you need 2/3s vote to end debate and hold a vote (called cloture). It’s unlikely you’d get the 15 or so Dems needed for this to happen.

          The complicated answer is that Congress has been perfectly happy ceding more and more of its authority to the Presidency for a long time now. When you’re elected for a two-year term (as Representatives are) but spend 1+ year campaigning (because seriously, fuck US elections) you don’t want to do anything that even the short-term-memories of American voters might remember. So they’re perfectly happy letting the President take the blame for anything if it’s their party in the White House, or obstructing him if it’s not.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            The point they’re trying to make seems to be that the specific unofficial Signal app they are using does archive those messages. So the fact Signal by itself doesn’t, is irrelevant. The government is paying TeleMessage for this Signal app instead of using the official Signal app… The only reason for that would be for the archiving capability.

            I mean… If they’re using Signal specifically because it doesn’t store messages, and they are trying to hide the communications and not archive them… They wouldn’t be using the app capable of archiving them in the first place, they’d just use the official Signal app.

            Not sure why this is hard for people to understand since the article is explaining exactly what this app is and does and how it bypasses the “Signal doesn’t arching texts” issue entirely, because it doesn’t matter what the official Signal app does or doesn’t do.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Everyone gets that. What you don’t seem to get is that when the law says government communications must be archived, it doesn’t mean “an Israeli company has a copy of all my sensitive texts” is how to accomplish that.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                How do you know they have access to the archived data? That’s possible… but requires making assumptions that the application sends the archive data back to the company, which is not a guarantee by any means. Not everything operates via vendor-run infrastructure, most enterprise applications are designed to work with an enterprise-run solution for exactly this type of reason. This isn’t a program aimed at the general public.

                They make the client application, it is entirely possible that the client simply sends that data to a specified database, and the apps on these devices are set to a server run by the US government. It’s not hard to verify where the archive info leaving a device via any network interface is going. You can’t just hide a connection from the phone to an additional random server, especially if you’re looking for weird connections when validating solutions to implement.

                Is it possible that they have it running to a server run by the company? Of course it’s possible. That doesn’t mean it’s plausible, or even likely here. We don’t know how the app is set up or where it archives to. Assuming it must archive back to the company though is ignorant of how anything remotely related to these types of things work.

                On a side note… When was the contract for this application setup? Was it signed by the Trump admin or has it been in place for years to archive these types of communications and we’re only talking about it now because of the Trump officials being idiots brought it into the news cycle?

                An archiving application isn’t inherently insecure just because it’s third party, or even made by a foreign company. There’s a shit ton of technology bought from foreign countries because that’s the best option.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, both are a problem because they aren’t approved and controlled.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Sure. You are legally required to archive all correspondence by approved by our security departments software, not a corporate app that shares the info with corporations and are on unsecured servers. Our security warned them to not do this and they did it anyway.

      Also, do you remember “but her emails” for Hillary Clinton? That was because she used a private app for some of her emails. She wasn’t using it to wage a war.

      Lemme get this straight

      It’s a problem for the government to use signal because all govt correspondence needs to be on record and retrievable in the future

      But it’s also a problem to use archiving of encrypted chats?

      Not an American, can someone explain?

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      mossad, looking through the logs: “already knew that. tell us something we don’t know ffs.”