• jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “Duolingo will remain a company that cares deeply about its employees”

    Except for the contract employees. Fuck those people.

    In 2012, we bet on mobile. […] That decision helped us win the 2013 iPhone App of the Year and unlocked the organic word-of-mouth growth that followed. Betting on mobile made all the difference. We’re making a similar call now, and this time the platform shift is AI.

    I think this is some sort of fallacy, not sure which tho. Maybe a hasty generalization? “We bet on mobile twelve years ago and won, so if we bet on AI now we’ll also win.”

    *It also seems they’re using AI to code… those poor programmers will have to double check every single line it shits out because you know, it’s a fucking AI. Yet another company succumbs to a CEOs emotional FOMO.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except for the contract employees. Fuck those people.

      I mean technically the contractors are not employees

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yeah, like, I think this is a bad move for Duolingo as a company, since their code quality will rapidly go downhill with the current state of AI generated code.

        But also, if you are a contract employee, you should be prepared to be let go at any moment. That’s sort of the whole point of being a contract employee - you are only employed for the contract. It isn’t unethical in anyway for a company to not rehire employees who knew up front that they might not be rehired.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s just a tool like anything else. You can’t put the genie back in the lamp. Some jobs go away and new jobs are created. Look at every industrial revolution we’ve had in the past. AI technology is not to the point of replacing mankind.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The difference is that the actual revolutions like that generally use technology that actually works.

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Have you ever used AI tools? What kinds of things are you expecting it to do? It can do a lot of minor tasks well.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Honestly, at this point I sort of wish there was a new technology that was as advanced and useful and revolutionary as the various hype-waves of the last few years have claimed, be it block chain, hyperloop or now AI. They all share in common that the hype just refuses to die because scammers love them even though their actual use cases are extremely limited.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah. Which means, replacing all workers with AI will not work out well. A wrench alone can’t fix your plumbing.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, except that ai is almost 40% wrong, yet it pretends to know everything and sounds very convincing. It will never tell you “i don’t know” or “that’s a bad idea, don’t do that” like a real person or friend would do but instead encourages your with everything. Still, app developers sell ai chat bots as “virtual friends” to insecure people.

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Of course any implementation will need oversight, but it can do many things as good or better than a human.

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        For sure. You don’t just let it run the show. Nobody is saying there won’t be oversight.

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So if they’re using a ChatGPT wrapper to teach me languages, why do I need Duolingo? Copilot is free.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Copilot is free.

      Free.

      Free with ads.

      Freemium with ads.

      Free trial with tiered subscription service.

      New subscription tiers with reduced ads. Premium package for boosts to service.

      Please enter your credit card number and watch the ad to unlock device.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    For those who aren’t leaving Duolingo, you can still get the paid features by creating a class and joining it. Or at least that’s how it worked the last time I used it, which was a few years ago now.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Duolingo is a tragedy. They really quickly realized that you don’t make money teaching things - you make it on retention and gamification.

    Mango languages is great if your library has a subscription. I believe the US’s foreign service materials are also really good, if you want effective but boring.

    • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Duolingo was shit for learning, for me at least.

      So i left rather quickly, then came back hoping i could pick up some more Italian and noticed they summomed another paid tier. I wonder how many tiers they can summon up until they stop existing.

      • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Your local library may have a Mango subscription plan for card holders. You might be able to find it on their website but a librarian would definitely know.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s not gamification that’s the issue. That aspect really held my attention and gave me consistency.

      It’s the push to a pay-to-win model that made me quit. They made the challenges harder and harder to complete without using boosts, and to use the boosts you had to use gems. And gems were really hard to get unless you bought them with real money. It doesn’t matter if you have a super subscription (or whatever it’s called), you still had to pay to get the gems.

      And the prices for the gems were just as predatory and the disgusting mobile gaming industry. Never should there be an option to spend over $20 for in-game consumables, nevermind over $100. It’s sick.

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      115
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was so upset last year when they got rid of the comment section. There were often helpful explanations for WHY you conjugate the word that way, or how native speakers might use a different word.

      • sqibkw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t know how good this feature was on Duolingo, but there’s a site/app called HiNative that does a really good job at this sort of thing.

      • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t worry, you can upgrade to Duolingo Max for even more money and have the AI explain it. (Seriously.)

        • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, I saw that. I have the family plan (some people in the house go through a lot of hearts (mistakes)) and still have to see ads for Max.

      • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, the comment section was amazing…and then they came out with “max”, where you get “explain my answer” for a premium, powered by a [notoriously fallible] LLM. This is the definition of enshitification.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Never used it but that sounds like such a neat concept.

        Does anyone know of any free language learning apps that have a comment section? (And a user base that utilizes the comment section, of course.)

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      The gameification part was good, it made it easier to keep up the habbit, though I recently got locked out for no apparent reason so apparently they just outright want to fail? Any good free alternatives? (I wasn’t using the paid version)

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Here’s a website with those FSI courses I referenced earlier, as well as Peace Corps training materials. This is going to be the boring route. Drill drill drill, but you get good at it.

        As a general strategy - on the Omniglot forums a billion years ago there was a method called Listen-Read which I think does wonders for me. You pick a longer book, preferably one you have enjoyed and read already in English. You get a copy of that book in English and your target language, as well as audiobook (let’s go with say, French), then you listen to the audio book in French while reading the book in English, then switch to listening to an English audiobook while reading the French book, then the audiobook in French while reading the French.

        Librivox and Project Gutenberg are godsends. I did Candide this way, and part of Les Miserables. This is obviously less immediate fun/dopamine satisfying than Duolingo is, but will teach you to read better than Duolingo will. It’s not great at expressive language - while I can read Proust, my « je voudrais un Diet Coke » was not well received in Paris.

        If you have a language in mind I can probably point you in some other directions.

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Any good free alternatives?

        You won’t like the idea but…

        spoiler

        pirating a textbook from Libgen/Anna’s Archive

  • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s okay. We can all play that game. I’ve replaced my use of Duolingo with AI.

    Pro tip: have as your “system prompt” in your LLM of choice “at the end of every query, include me a short Swedish relates to my prompt”. No need for Duolingo.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you decide to cancel your subscription and delete your account, they give a warning when deleting that says you need to cancel your subscription SEPARATELY. Just a heads up for anyone thinking of leaving like I did.

  • gramie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I have found Duolingo much, much less useful for language learning than Language Transfer. The latter actually helps you learn to think in another language rather than memorize things (which is still useful, but not nearly as much).

    Short if total immersion, I have found nothing better than LT.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The problem I have with finding an alternative is that most just offer some five to ten largest languages. Want to learn Spanish, French, Russian, or Chinese? There are hundreds of both free and paid services available. Want to learn Hungarian, Irish, or Finnish? It’s Duolingo and a scant handful of sites specific to that language.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Dreaming Spanish, if you are trying to learn Spanish. I seriously think it is the future of language learning, bar none.

      • gramie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Just audio. But it is presented in a way that helps you to learn, rather than just remember. If you give it a try, I promise that you will be shocked at how you can retain the knowledge.

        It isn’t enough on its own, however. You need to reinforce the lessons by speaking to people, reading, and/or TV and movies.

    • yum@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I get the hate for Duolingo, but you can actually learn with it

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Right? My partner has used it for years and is now able to read simple to medium books and watch some movies in the learned language.

      • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Duolingo got me enough vocabulary in Spanish to put the simplest sentences together, and then follow more robust lessons. I still think it was a good starting point, but I won’t use it anymore on principle.

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    There are at least some Duolingo courses that use AI voices exclusively and they are shit.

    On the one hand, having an AI to talk to sounds like something that could be good. Getting a real person to talk to every user would be impossible. I just don’t think the technology is going to meet expectations any time soon.

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      They do this in the French course. Half the time it still can’t understand what I’m saying. Maybe that’s on me, but still. C’est la vie.

    • Unboxious@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem is if the user asks the AI a question about the language they’re learning they’ll often get confident bullshit as the response and they won’t know it’s wrong because they’re still learning.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, I prepaid for a year about 2 months ago. I’m gonna use it, but not renew. Fuck em