• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Can confirm.

      I have a robot that clears snow on my driveway (it’s a diy build,). One winter, we were having problems with a couple teenage boys chucking snowballs at cars.

      Their dads conspired to teach them a lesson.

      They recruited me and S5-SY (the robot, pronounced “Sassy”,).

      So they played some mind games to get the kids to think it was their idea to record themselves-live- chucking snowballs at the “defenseless” robot.

      In the video, the robot turned to face them, drove itself into the snow bank and turned on its sweeper to give them the worst white wash of their lives.

      • brisk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Is the lesson “why throw snowballs at cars when you could be having a snowball fight with a robot instead?”

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          actually, I’m pretty sure the lesson they learned was they got more of the attention they wanted when they were funny rather than jerks.

          Their friends thought the were in on it and were laughing. not sure how they passed that off, since their faces were 1 part confusion 1 part shock and 2 parts “fuck that’s cold”

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m sorry, you can’t just say “I built a robot that clears snow”, like it’s no big deal! Do you have more details? Also, please link the video of it blizzarding the teens!

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I don’t have the video (and wouldn’t link other people’s kids anyhow.), sorry.

          In any case, I’d drop a how-to, except that it’s actually rather kludgey. just getting a driveway dialed in took about two weeks. (movement is largely dead reckoning in similar manner to using an FDM printer in relative mode.)

          her working-side is a snow sweeper brush- you can buy replacement brushes online and not the whole snow sweeper, for the record. the big drum-shaped brushes. she uses a hub-mounted motor to drive that and her two driving wheels. a couple car batteries and and her control box provide counterbalance and mass (for traction,) while her 3rd wheel is a caster wheel.

          she uses an inductive charger in a cradle, with everything basically sealed in a water proof enclosure/chasis that was 3d printed.

          there’s a base station that’s mounted high up under the garage’s eaves that has a camera deciding when it’s time to go out. (she struggles with heavy, wet, snow, but this gets compensated for by going out more often when it’s warmer. the base station also provides localization and object avoidance.

          building was simple enough. I’ve a giant home-build 3d printer, PETG works, Polycarb is better if you can afford it. For sealing the enclosures, I made my own silicone rubber gaskets using silicone caulk and aquarium tubing (force the caulk into the tubing using the caulking gun. if you want it hollow, use an air compressor blower nozzle to blow out the tubing after it’s full, if you want it solid, don’t, but after it’s cured in the tubing, use the blower nozzle to get it out, either way.)

          the other thing to consider is the sweeper arm. It can just be set rigidly for simplicity (and that’s a 100% valid and probably smart choice to make…) or if you add the ability to extend on both sides, you can give the brush a cant so it pushes the snow to one side or the other… reducing how many trails you leave.

          Some flashy lights are important (and raised up so people can see them in cars!)

          Oh. also. she hums like R2D2 when she’s working.

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    That the risk you take with an outdoor cat. It’s not even like water is harmful to it.

    I used to have an outdoor cat and if that happened I would have shrugged it off and expected him not to go there again.

    • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s the risk you take letting your kid go outside. It’s not even like water is harmful to it.

      I used to have a kid that went outside and if thst happened I would have shrugged it off and expected him to not go there anymore.

    • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “Nobody got hurt, just LET ASSHOLE BE ASSHOLES! MUH FREEDUMS!”

      Nah, I’m a firm believer in ‘Fuck around and Find out’

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That the risk you take

      Well someone might just hit your car, that’s the risk you take by driving, nobody got hurt, they shouldn’t be held accountable. I would have shrugged it off and started taking the bus.

      This is fun, we can remove all accountability from everything that’s not harming someone directly!

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the risk you take with an outdoor brat. It’s not even like water is harmful to it.

      I used to have an outdoor brat and if that happened I would have shrugged it off and expected him not to go there again.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Stop letting your children roam, you assholes. Maybe keep your child off your neighbours property? Don’t make your child someone else’s pest and they won’t be treated as such.

      Roaming children are a big problem, not to mention the entitlement of parents who think it’s ok to open their doors and let their children fuck off to do whatever on whoever’s property. Imagine if foster parents did that? They rightly have their foster child taken away and charged

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        As someone who has had neighbor’s children randomly walk into my house and demand things like food, water (I won’t say no to children, I’m not heartless), and use of my TV and internet. I’m sorry, but don’t let kids be pest is unironic in some areas. Some people haven’t socialized their kids properly and we were the ones who had to explain to these kids (4 to 6 year olds) that wandering without permission into other people’s houses was not only inappropriate but dangerous to them. We, the strangers, telling these kids that they should be wary of strangers. The parents just didn’t give a fuck and wouldn’t even talk to us, but they were apparently fine with their kids roaming into stranger’s homes. I’m glad we moved away.

      • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Funny thing is that most children in the West nowadays are indoors children that only ever go outside to be driven between places.

    • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      As if the kid threw the water for that reason. Maybe the neighbor shouldn’t have let the kid roam? Would fit your logic.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    24 hours ago

    My neighbors daughter had one of those water guns. I told her if she shoots at me, I’ll get the hose and retaliate. She grinned, shot at me, and ran away laughing.

    I talked to her dad, he nodded, and when she came back for more mischief, she got wet.

  • robador51@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    We’ve a lot of cats coming through the garden. I wouldn’t mind if not for my dog, who does and goes insane when she spots a cat. So I’ve been thinking about getting a super soaker to chase them away. I think that’s pretty harmless, and perhaps they learn to skip our garden after a while… What do you lot think?

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Hahah simply. I’ve only trained a handful of dogs, so professional dog trainers sound off here but there are dogs that are more or less untrainable. Sure difficult dogs can learn a few manors or tricks, but either because an abundance or lack of intelligence they’re not going to ever be a show dog. Depending on the dog maybe the best they get is just not as reactive instead.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Get a cat from your local shelter. Take them to the shelter to get spayed or neutered and adopted.

        • alekwithak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          If they’re collared or chipped they can be returned to their irresponsible owners, and if the owner is so irresponsible they their unfixed uncollared cat is roaming freely than good riddance.

    • pugehenis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I could take shit from people to some extent but if it is my pets, I am putting a smile on that face

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah but with a ten year old, talk to their parents first. You want to drench a child without their consent? Okay but they had better be in an environment that can explain to them that this is a tit for tat type thing. A ten year old doesn’t understand a lot of things and it’s not up to the child to perform what we expect them to. Do they need to be corrected, yes. Does doing it so callously benefit anyone? Only a bully. There’s a huge difference between constructive discipline and just straight up punishment. It takes an adult to know the difference.

      • the_wiz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 seconds ago

        At age ten I was coding in Assembly on my C64 and build radio controlled model airplanes without assistance from an adult… so I guess in this case the ten year old should have a pretty clear understanding of his action and the consequences. And to be honest: What did happen? He got wet. Booo-hoo what a tragedy! Would he have gotten a good spanking (would perhaps have happened when I was this age in the 80s), then perhaps I could slightly understand the outrage from his dad.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ten-year-olds understand quite a lot of things. They don’t always think before they act, but they would absolutely understand this object lesson.

        It’s water. It’s not harmful. Getting splashed with water is most ten-year-olds’ idea of a good time in most scenarios.

        Is this the most constructive way to go about teaching a kid how to behave properly? No.

        Is this going to scar the average kid for life? Also no.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        A bucket of bullets does not sound that threatening. A bucket of battery acid, tepid water, or mud, a bit more. Although I would not recommend escalating stuff in general, people fucking around pets needs that sometimes.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If someone intentionally caused harm to any of my cats, I live near a large national forest, and once you get a few hundred yards off a trail, no one is going to find a body.

    • ratel@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Who tf gets a pet cat and doesn’t let it outside? If you don’t have space for a cat don’t get one.

      • IceyPea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        People with coyotes for neighbours.

        I’m not gonna shame people for outdoor cats… but you’re being a little obtuse here.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Who tf gets a pet cat and doesn’t let it outside?

        People that love their cats and don’t want them to die young. Outdoor cats live an average of 2-5 years, indoor-only cats live an average of 10-15 years. By allowing cats outside, they’re exposed to pathogens, parasites, and dangers that they wouldn’t otherwise experience. In my area, there are coyotes, bobcats, rattlesnakes, hawks, and owls, all of which will quite happily make a meal of a cat. There are also cars; they don’t tend to be able to stop on a dime.

        • ratel@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Sounds like a perfect environment to not own a cat. Don’t get get a cat if you live in an area that can’t accommodate them - they aren’t a universal pet despite the fact people treat them like they are.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Don’t get get a cat if you live in an area that can’t accommodate them

            What is an area that can accommodate pet cats lol

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Under that criteria, there are a grand total of zero areas that can accommodate them. Same goes for dogs.

            But that’s a stupid criteria, because cats are tamed, and thrive indoors.

            Hope that helps.

        • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Worldwide domestic cats kill billions of songbirds annually. Many songbirds are insectivores that prey on mosquitoes and flys helping to keep their numbers in check.

            • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              Habitat loss, bioaccumulation of Neonicotinoids and predation by invasive species (domestic cats included) are top three issues for declining numbers of songbirds in the US.

              Edit: added region

              • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                45 minutes ago

                Even the studies most friendly to your position put the conglomerate that cats are counted it in 4th place - e.g.:

                1. Habitat Loss & Degradation (40-50%)
                2. Climate Change (20-30%)
                3. Pesticides & Chemical Pollution (10-15%)
                4. Predation by Domestic & Invasive Species (5-10%)
                5. Collisions (5-10%)
                6. Disease & Parasites (1-5%)
                7. Illegal Hunting & Trapping (1-3%)
                8. Light Pollution (<1-2%)

                Let’s be very generous and concede cats could contribute 5% (sorry magpies, crows, etc pp. - you contribte almost nothing)

                I don’t argue this point because I am way to fond of cats. I don’t even agree with the above scale - at least when it comes to (formerly) common birds such as house sparrow (Passer domesticus) and common blackbird (Turdus merula). Their main problems are Usutu virus and loss of insect biomass.

                I am shit-scared about the loss of insect biomass. I am old and observant enough to have recognized the Windshield phenomenon by myself. I concur with the Danish study hinting at a 80% decrease from 1997 until 2017 (I actually think it is higher now). I live in major city with nice parks - the decrease is observable here too.

                If the food supply of songbirds has declined by at least 80% that is your biggest problem right there - and it does not only affect songbirds and not only insectivores.

                Over-emphasizing cats in this situation is a smoke screen/ red herring akin to BP pushing the carbon footprint of the common man.

                • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 minutes ago

                  Major environmental effects of climate change be it sea level rise, ocean acidification, drought, intensifying storms and temperature rise are all changes to abiotic conditions. Changing abiotic conditions leads to changes in biotic conditions. A habitat is defined by the combination of biotic and abiotic conditions. Therefore climate change should be included in habitat loss.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Letting it roam freely risks it getting hurt and without you being there to help it. It’s not very responsible.

    • Beastimus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In this case by cup it probably actually refers to a pint glass of water (two measuring cups), but in any case not an exact measurement, so it doesn’t make sense to give exact measurements. Its describing the vessels of transportation, not the amounts.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/basin

          A) an open usually circular vessel with sloping or curving sides used typically for holding water for washing

          B) chiefly British : a bowl used especially in cooking

          C) the quantity contained in a basin spilled a basin of water on the floor

          Not only is that not a measurement the US uses, the only geographical location mentioned in the definition is “chiefly British.”

          So, uh, “no.”