I don’t believe one exists, correct me if i am wrong. I believe something like this should be worked on as i sense youtube is going to tighten down soon, too. Would it even be possible?

    • peregus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s still bandwidth. If every single video viewed uses (for example) 2Mbps, 10.000 video viewed simultaneously would need 20Gbps.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        From who? It’s federated and distributed. Everyone watching it also re-streams it. You don’t need a massive data center in the cloud. The more people who are watching it. The more bandwidth there is for more people to watch it.

        • peregus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everyone watching is also restraining? Is that really how Peertube works? I didn’t know! Does it works using chunks form different people or video is fully uploaded by a single user?

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes WebRTC is highly similar to BitTorrent. You have your initial uploader who seeds. Every person that then downloads a chunk to watch it is also then capable of sending that chunk back out. Thereby the more people that watch the more people that can watch. Even back in 2012 with the Kodi piracy plugins. You could click on watching a show. And within a minute or two you would be watching the show in decent quality. Though at the time they were actually using straight up bit torrent just tuned to send the first chunks first so you could watch it as it streamed. So as far as bandwidth on storage requirements are concerned is pretty minimal. Unless of course you’re trying to run a large public instance. Then you are still on the hook for some basic storage.