• Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is why I don’t believe people when they say “we don’t have an overpopulation problem, we have a distribution problem”

    Because if everyone in the world had my lifestyle, we would be emitting an insane amount of carbon. And I don’t want my standard of living to go down, and in fact I want everyone to live as nicely as I do. So clearly we need fewer people.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      How much of your carbon emissions are due to your quality of life and how much is due to inefficiencies/waste?

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Assuming you live in North America, travel is highly inefficient with personal cars and high airplane usage.

          Meat consumption on the other hand is a lifestyle choice. Personally, if be willing to reduce mine if we stopped subsidizing the industry and therefore stopped incentivizing such high consumption.

          • kablammy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Why are you waiting until the meat industry is no longer subsidised to reduce your meat consumption?

            • n2burns@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m on a budget. I eat less meat than the average North American, but I still need protein and meat is a lot less expensive than many of the alternatives, partially because we subsidize the meat industry so much.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The overpopulation isn’t happening in the 1%.

      It makes jack shit of a difference to the environment if there is one billion or two billion starving people. They’re not the ones burning carbon or eating steak.

    • rchive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      On the other hand, if everyone in the world had your lifestyle the world would be much more wealthy and could make a lot of positive changes.