Mine is that Discovery should have been a series taking place in the Picard era.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Keiko wasn’t that bad of a character. She wasn’t a great character, but the biggest problem was that her actress, Rosalind Chao, had very poor chemistry with Colm Meaney, who in turn had great chemistry primarily with Alexander Siddig, and also with several other actors. This wasn’t a problem when she was cast in “Data’s Day” as the bride to be with nervous bride energy, if anything that’s an asset in such a short time frame. But then expecting that to work in what is supposed to be a long-term marriage is what led to perception of her being all MIIIIIILES all the time.

    Now, I don’t know that mid to late 90s Star Trek producers would have been on board, but they should have written an amicable divorce plot for the O’Briens. Miles and Keiko clearly grew apart from each other over the course of the show. Between her extended trips to Bajor and the way she all but threw Miles at Kira, they were already about 85% of the way there anyway. A divorce would have been a great way to resolve that issue, and use Star Trek as it was always intended: to explore real life issues in a scifi universe.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    They need to actually give a full look into the economics of the federation. Yeah, it’s space communism. But I want more specifics.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      There’s a recent episode in Lower Decks where they liberate a planet from capitalism… by essentially taking all the “worthless” gold and jewels and giving it to Space Pirate Royalty to broker a peace deal between them and the Federation.

      I don’t doubt that the majority of the occupants of said planet are now happier not having to grind for capital…, but apparently having capital is still an immensely useful resource that the Federation is happy to, uh, quietly commandeer in lieu of payment for its, uh, services to the planet(?)

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I still need to catch up on the latest season(s?) of lower decks. And given the fact that lower decks is a comedy, and borderline non-canon, I’d take that with a giant grain of salt.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Energy-to-(organic)matter conversion + futuristic power generators makes feeding your population a triviality. That simplifies just about any economic system, which takes a lot of the complicated stuff out of government and class hierarchies.

      But Star Trek is a fictional utopia, much like Communism.

      In reality, corruption would still mess up government in a “real world” Star Trek. I’m a casual Trekkie, but I don’t recall much detail about the Federation’s or Earth’s government structure. Do people still vote? Is it a benevolent military dictatorship? Who knows? And who cares? It’s not really relevant to the themes of the shows.

      Star Trek is founded on liberal ideas popular in the mid-20th century that humanity could achieve unity and peace if it just cast aside superficial differences like race and gender, allowing us to focus on exploring the universe once we’d gotten over fighting each other. That’s the very core of the entire franchise and I’m fine leaving it that way, unscrutinized, since it clearly doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. It’s like how the force is best left a mystical property of the universe in Star Wars, rather than science-ized with medichlorians.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That simplifies just about any economic system, which takes a lot of the complicated stuff out of government and class hierarchies.

        Right, but they very clearly don’t get all of their food out of a replicator, nor do they use the holodeck for things like hair cuts. There is still people who serve as cooks, waitresses, barbers, etc despite the technology being there to not need those jobs.

        And that’s what I want explored in more depth.

        I’m a casual Trekkie, but I don’t recall much detail about the Federation’s or Earth’s government structure. Do people still vote? Is it a benevolent military dictatorship? Who knows? And who cares?

        I’ve been dipping my toe in the books. At least in the first book for PIC, The Last Best Hope, they very clearly still have political struggles for power, corruption, tribalism, and voting. It ain’t a dictatorship, but the goals and views of the government leaders aren’t wholey benevolent.

        A particularly good example was the Federation council member Olivia Quest. She’s a rep from a border planet, whos been facing some issues with the romulan star going supernova, and all the immigrants that are mayhaps being sent their way. So she raises a big stink over any and all help towards the romulans. It’s self serving, selfish, and tribalism, but she was voted in and she wasn’t alone.

        All of this is very familiar to real life. But it’s the exact kind of details I want, but on one of the shows. They made it interesting in the books, they could just as easily make it interesting in the show.

        That’s the very core of the entire franchise and I’m fine leaving it that way, unscrutinized, since it clearly doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

        Maybe the tech of replicators/transporters/holodecks should be left unscrutinized, because ultimately it relies on technobable for it to be compatible with a suspension of disbelief. But I don’t think the same goes for the societal structures of the federation. It worked in the Last Best Hope, I think it could work on the screen.

  • couggod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    As much as it is fun to revisit legacy characters and settings, they need to do a complete break, TNG style, and set a show somewhere where we can have new adventures with new characters. Lower Decks is somehow the closest to doing this and it’s a member berry show. The constant revisiting (and retconning) is slowly suffocating the franchise.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Yeah, somewhere in the 26th century when time travel is the final frontier would be cool. An entire ship of historians infiltrating alien history.

      Could be a combination of Loki and Dr Who.

  • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Lower Decks deserves 7 seasons x23 episodes per season, with better quality animation for the space-based visuals

  • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Star Trek should not be as expansive as it is, because the sheer volume discourages new viewers from engaging with it more than casually. It’s the same problem as one piece.

    New IP pls

  • cumtownenjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    TNG is boring as hell, genuinely, and a complete abandonment of the space opera formula that gave TOS its charm. The entire TNG cast is dull and equally as robotic as Data, who gets far too much emphasis every episode. It’s exhausting and repetitive to constantly show Data making the same head and eyebrow movements, demonstrating emotions like irritation while everybody pretends he doesn’t have emotions, and everybody prefacing every sentence with “Captain…” Frankly I think TNG was written to appeal exclusively to nerds who get off on watching people do things robotically. The only interesting character is Q because everybody else’s dead performance makes him look like a superstar.

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The Wrath of Khan ruined Khan’s character.

    Khan was introduced in the episode Space Seed, where his crew of genetically-enhanced tyrants are discovered hibernating on a ship, having been kicked off Earth centuries before. It’s a wonderful episode about opposing moral perspectives, and we get the positive and negative views on both.

    You could say it’s about slave/herd morality versus master/strength morality, or you could say it’s about compassionate humanism vs tyrannical domination. Both these perspectives are given their space in the episode.

    Khan talks about how they were actually persecuted for their reproductive schemes, how that’s an infringement on their freedom. That makes him somewhat sympathetic, but at the same time he accepts nobody’s rules except his own.

    The most interesting part is how the crew of the Enterprise are actually enamoured with the strength, charisma, and freedom of the tyrants. The final scene (after they defeat Khan) show the crew almost lamenting how they can’t do the kind of tyranny that Khan does. They want it, they kind of respect it, but they acknowledge the importance of equality and rule of law, so they almost-grudgingly agree that they did the right thing by defeating him.

    When they defeat Khan they exile his crew once again to a harsh planet.

    Ultimately the episode demonstrates why fascism will always be alluring to men and women, and also why it’s important to make sure that it doesn’t take over.

    Then we get The Wrath of Khan. Khan is no longer charismatic. There’s no philosophical discussion. Just a revenge story. And this is somehow the version of Khan we remember!

    You could argue that Khan’s vengeful turn is what happens when the spirit of freedom is crushed and ostracized. That would make a good arc, and a good psychological study. But none of that is discussed. He’s just a bitter, resentful loser who will stop at nothing to hurt Kirk. Khan as a character is ruined, and the story isn’t even ten percent as good as the episode where he was introduced.

    Edit: I had the name of the episode wrong.

    • flicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This is such an interesting take, because I have such a different one!

      I maintain that, in his anger, in his vengeance, he was right. Being exiled to Ceti Alpha 5, when no one knew that Ceti Alpha 6 had exploded years ago and destroyed the habitability of Ceti Alpha 5 (oh my God, no one thought to check on the marooned Khan and his people in fifteen years?) means that he was a victim. And there was no justice.

      I still thought of Khan and his people as charismatic and strong and intelligent- but victimized by Kirk, they were correct to seek revenge. What was done to them was not justice. It was cruel and unusual punishment. I also found it a testament to their strength that they survived for 14-and-a-half years on that hellhole.

      Loved your comments. Love the different perspective!

      • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m not necessarily saying he was wrong (although his mission is a race to the bottom). And yeah, the victimization could explain his deterioration from a great man to a warped vengeance-seeking psycho. But as a character there was nothing interesting going on there. He’s just a generic Bad Guy, for the plot.

        But I like your points. It’s nice to see some Khan appreciation!

  • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Mine is that Ahsoka has become a bit overrated over the past decade. Yes, we grew up with the clone wars, we saw her grow into a fantastic character, and yes she deserves the attention she’s getting. But everything she’s in now seems to be just to get adult fans nostalgic for their childhood. I’m worried that I’m going to stop caring the next time Disney makes a new property about her. It’s hard seeing my childhood die in front of me while I watch.

    Moral of story: stop making sequels. I want another season of Andor!

    Edit: I might be illiterate

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 days ago

    I can’t fucken see shit on the new ship sets except for on SNW. They all adopted Klingon lighting or something and even my glasses leave the scenes like the end of GoT.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 days ago

      I have that problem on my televisions, it turns out, it’s bad implementation of HDR.

      Turn HDR off on your devices and the picture is instantly bright and clear.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’mma try it out. Thank you, I always blamed it on my IT job destroying my eyesight always looking at screens up close.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s particularly bad on my Samsung sets, their HDR implementation is a known bug and there’s no way to disable it on the television itself, all you can do is disable it on connected devices.

          Then I find, everytime my Roku, Xbox, or Playstation gets an update, I have to disable it again. :(

          Still, better than watching a black scene in a coalmine. LOL.

          HDR on:

          HDR off:

        • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          You should look into some “gaming glasses”. Best Buy has them for like $50 but you can get some off Amazon for $12 instead.

          Or you should check into using something like Flux or the built in one for Windows (macOS has one too) for night mode.

          We got some newer monitors in the office a few years ago and had to enable it because the blue light was giving people headaches. But the warmer colors helped decrease that a lot.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I stole a pair of those from Best Buy in 2011 lol they work okay. Its the screen proximity. My eye muscles are used to viewing things up close so they stay restricted.

          • nef@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            There’s no actual evidence that blue light hurts your eyes, but it can affect your sleep. Instead you should worry about the distance you sit and the brightness relative to the room, as well as making sure to take regular breaks.

            • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              It might not have been causing any actual health issues, but it felt like too much on the eyes when we were sitting in relative darker areas and for longer periods of times of exposure.

              Using the night mode helped a lot with that intense feeling we were feeling. Getting the glasses has helped with the feeling for myself.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    The entire franchise should be handed over to Simon Pegg.

    He has the most thoughtful understanding of what Star Trek is suppose to be since Ronald Moore, Jeri Taylor, and Ira Steven Behr.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      would like to read more about this. I know he’s a fan, but I’m just cringing at the idea of the Cornetto trilogy expanding into Delta Quadrant…

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Picard should have died in season 1 of PIC and the rest of the seasons should have concentrated on the new crew gallivanting across the galaxy in their newly christened ship, “The Picard”.

    SNW should never have killed off Hemmer.

    Cumberbatch was miscast as Khan.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Cumberbatch should have been Gary Mitchell. He’s got the right vibe for a man losing touch with his humanity as he’s consumed by his godlike abilities, and a movie expanding on Mitchell would cover more new and interesting ground than plagiarizing Wrath of Khan.