Edit: to clarify: the message in the ad is actually ironic/satirical, mocking the advice for cyclists to wear high-viz at night.

It uses the same logic but inverts the parts and responsabilities, by suggesting to motorists (not cyclists) to apply bright paint on their cars.

So this ad is not pro or against high-viz, it’s against victim blaming

Cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113544508246569296

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I get the sentiment here but as I’ll always say the car wins.

    You can’t call it a death machine and then act like it’s not one.

    Cars have lights built in. Humans don’t. Wear the fucking highvis and save your life.

    Either that or start wearing light strips all over yourself.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Okay but hear me out here, we design streets where bikes and cars don’t have to share a lane. Crazy idea i know.

      We should design streets for the cyclists and drivers we have, not the ones we want.

      • DV8@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Fair point that roads should be designed a lot better, but in the mean time, if you’re going to be driving on roads that got put down originally 50 years ago without cycling paths and no lights in the middle of farmland. Wear the high Viz gear or make sure you have working lights and reflectors.

    • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Your standard bicycle has light too? If it’s about being the safest cyclist possible, you’d also need a loud siren declaring that a bicycle is on the road. At some point it is ridiculous how many non-mandatory rules you need to follow until drivers accept that they are to blame for the crash, how about we stick to the actual laws and people who can’t see a vehicle fitted with reflectors and lights get off the road.

      Hint: seeing the lights on a bicycle is easier when your wind shield isn’t 2 meters of the ground.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Your standard bicycle has light too

        No it doesn’t. It has reflectors but not actual lighting. I’ve almost hit a few cyclists who relied only on the reflectors on the wheels, front peg, and rear peg.

        Hint: seeing the lights on a bicycle is easier when your wind shield isn’t 2 meters of the ground.

        I’m not arguing pro cars here. My point is keep yourself fuckin safe. Don’t be stupid just because “bUt CaRs ArE tHe PrObLeM”

        You can’t say they’re a problem and then act like they’re not a problem.

        Complain all you want it’s perfectly valid. But do the shit you have to do to keep yourself the fuck alive.

        • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Goddamn, forgot that the USA considers bikes as exercise machines.

          Your standard commuter bike has lights, and is required by law to have it in most countries.