Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

Tim Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, has called for the electoral college system of electing US presidents to be abolished and replaced with a popular vote principle, as operates in most democracies.

His comments – to an audience of party fundraisers – chime with the sentiments of a majority of American voters but risk destabilising the campaign of Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, who has not adopted a position on the matter, despite having previously voiced similar views.

“I think all of us know, the electoral college needs to go,” Walz told donors at a gathering at the home of the California governor, Gavin Newsom. “We need a national popular vote. We need to be able to go into York, Pennsylvania, and win. We need to be in western Wisconsin and win. We need to be in Reno, Nevada, and win.”


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    While I agree with him, it’s also a stupid thing to say out loud during the election when they’re CLEARLY trying to sway moderate and uneasy right leaning voters.

    • Furball@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the electoral college has become pretty unpopular with pretty much everyone except committed republicans in recent years

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s become unpopular with everyone except the people who originally demanded it so they could count their slaves as 3/5 of a vote.

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Why though? We call baking people bakers, why shouldn’t we call enlaved people slaves?

            It’s not as if their circumstances become more human that way.

            • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s just good to reinforce the idea that enslaved people’s were people who were enslaved. Not a profession, slave was not their job, it was their status.

              Plus studies have shown that by using these people first language, especially while teaching the subject, results in higher empathy for enslaved people and reminds that their status as a slave was one forced upon them and continually so rather than the simple status they were born with.

              It’s not a huge problem or anything, but it isn’t hard to toss in every now and then and only does good.

              • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                “Good” like derailing conversations that were about content and making them about semantics. “Good”.

                • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  God forbid someone on a thread based system bring up a related topic on the side. Like, is that really your complaint? Oh no guys, the humanization of enslaved people’s is derailing this 3rd person’s quip. Quick, we must stop him!

                  Silly billy you are.

        • dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think it was progressive who demanded it to be 3/5 if then conservative had their way they would happily count slaves as two people. It’s was in their favour to do so. Slaves could vote and it inflated their population count which will grant more seat. I’m neither American nor have I been there.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Exactly, the result is decided but free starts and for example Republicans in California and New York feel their vote doesn’t matter at all.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          with the amount of money being spent to woo swing state voters I feel like being an “undecided voter” is some kind of career at this point

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe they’re finally realizing that instead of chasing right wing voters they should try to tap into the much larger pool of left-wing voters. Or at least one can hope.

    • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      His comments – to an audience of party fundraisers – chime with the sentiments of a majority of American voters

      I guess you missed this bit

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Just vote blue no matter who.

          It’s that simple, do that and you’ll uh somehow magically become a lefter country?