what exactly do you think Trump would have been doing if he were in office? Probably would have been extorting Palestine as he did with Ukraine.
what exactly do you think Trump would have been doing if he were in office? Probably would have been extorting Palestine as he did with Ukraine.
dunno, i feel like half the humor of barf scenes is how utterly unrealistic they are.
yeah same with me, except it’s just me and my wife. i think i just got service back.
might just be an inaccurate headline, I don’t think we know the exact order of things or when Verizon identified the issue.
I have no service at all, can’t get any kind of outgoing or incoming whatsoever. SOS only.
my wife and I both have iPhones. I have no service at all, hers seems to be fine.
exact same phones yeah.
It’s weird, my service has been dead, but my wife’s is just fine. So it doesn’t seem to be a geographical issue.
I legitimately don’t understand your question. If you’re asking if the cost to improve safety may be too great in some cases, yes that is true in some cases. But you haven’t made that case in this specific instance yet.
so by your logic since nothing is as bad as [choose any cause of death], we should just… give up on improving safety?
I was giving them the chance to clarify their point, because they didn’t say anything beyond “nothing is safe” as a justification for poo-pooing an attempt to improve safety. Hence the question, which they have so far declined to answer themselves.
The point ContrarianTrail was making is that there is some risk in nearly everything. People have died as a result of garden tools, cars, house pets, shaving, buckets, toothpicks, baseball, etc. Here’s a list.
Yes, we all know “nothing is safe”. it’s a trivial point to make, and if that’s the only part of the situation you mention (as the person above did) you’re either not thinking very hard or are being deliberately misleading.
I prefer pull cords on my blinds, and I find the new regulations annoying. But I guess some federal agency decided they aren’t so useful that it’s worth the risk to children. And it would be selfish to be all upset about it if it saves some child’s life.
Exactly, it’s not that hard to understand. Pull-cord blinds cause deaths, and other reasonable alternatives do not. Framing the discussion to “100%” and dismissing accidents/deaths as anecdotes, to me, seems deliberately misleading. Yet you accuse me of being inflammatory by asking a follow up question. okay.
contextualize how?
i guarantee you in the fine print they say they have the right to change anything they want any time.
Are you saying we should not have safety regulations just because we can’t make everything 100% safe?
probably because their cost is sunk in the real estate already and no one wants to buy it.
in here somewhere. godspeed.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?538664-1/president-trump-campaigns-prairie-du-chien-wisconsin
edit: I have no life.
even then it would only be one die.
I swear to god if you say fold it in ONE MORE TIME
because you can’t let the other people have benefits too! hence “national socialism”.
Trump: