Hey guys, it was brought up in a report that NSFW tags should be applied to posts depicting drug use. What do you guys think? I could see it either way and thought you guys might like to weigh in on it. I personally don’t find it particularly offensive but my work environments have never been the type to react strongly to something like this popping up on screen (I think they might be more upset about being on Lemmy at all). Currently there is no rule, and I am fine with that, unless feedback indicates the community would rather play it safe and require the NSFW flag.

  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
    shield
    OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I appreciate the many voices here. It seems like consensus is that the tag is not needed as a general rule. I want to be clear, also, that the NSFW tag is not censorship, but also doesn’t seem necessary either. Thank you guys for chiming in!

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    are we talking a joint? if so then it should apply to alcohol and cigarrettes. I can understand for injections. some folks are neddlephobes.

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The original question came up over snorting drugs through a rolled up C note but would also likely encompass shooting heroin or smoking meth/crack. But the consensus appears to be not to ask for an NSFW tag at this time. So that will be our stance unless you guys decide things are going too far and you want the tag included on posts with that sort of content.

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It definitely is for those things, but in general it’s meant to encompass things that would cause problems if a coworker or manager looked over your shoulder. Graphic depictions of illegal drug use is borderline which is why I wanted to ask the community how they felt about it.

  • trolololol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well mate this tag is more useful to me around kids than in the office. Perhaps because I’m 100% wfh.

    Anyways, I appreciate it also with gore images like certain Ukraine and Gaza pictures. So it’s not just about work for me and others.

    Now if we had a mandatory tag like this for politics I’d do the big brains meme and be soooo happy.

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Politics aren’t allowed in !memes. We do try to catch it when a political meme is posted.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      But seriously tho, yeah, NSFW in the absence of another more specific tag.

      Some people are recovering from addiction and stuff, good to give them a way to filter it out

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Text is never going to need the tag. To the contrary, if you’re at work reading text posts, and it’s tagged NSFW, it draws the eye more.

    Tagging text posts would defeat the entire purpose of the tag in its useful purpose.

    Drug use isn’t NSFW anyway, not in images or text.

    • Aa!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      What do you think the tag is for?

      People at work don’t (shouldn’t) click on NSFW-tagged content. If it draws your eye even more, then I assume you don’t browse from work.

      How would it defeat the purpose to tag content that most workplaces would not be okay with? If you don’t mind seeing the content, then the tag might entice you. People at work will recognize it and not click

  • Nicht BurningTurtle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    No, depictions of drug use aren’t nsfw. And if we start censoring it, why not also start censoring other relatively harmless concepts like depictions of weapons or cursewords? We don’t want this, and trying to enforce it would add additional, unnecessary work to both you and the admins.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    NSFW has typically been used for things that are visually disturbing, like gore and sexually explicit materials. Using it for ideas that aren’t safe for work feels like it would devalue the tag.

    • Aa!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The tag is for warning people browsing at work not to click… Using it to prevent someone from clicking on a post that would be unacceptable to read at the workplace is exactly what it’s for

      It’s not like it’s censorship, it’s just a warning tag.

    • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I would hazard a guess that this was brough up in reference to a meme on this board showing a close up of someone snorting a line of white powder. I can completely understand why that might not be considered suitable for all places and audiences.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Possibly, but a workplace where even a joke about drug use would be an employment issue would be pretty unusual.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Some people can’t drink at work, the double standards of people is hilarious.

        Looking at pictures of beer or people drinking is no different.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Lots of places have beer fridges, or let their employees hit the bar for lunch or wine and wine clients on the company dollar.

            The hell you talking about?

            You done stalking me yet?

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      What about a person injecting themselves? I don’t think anyone is necessarily complaining about smoking, but personally I don’t exactly want to be seeing pictures of people injecting themselves or others, others especially, without any potential warning.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            So you also have an issue with people breast feeding in public?

            The human body is not something to be ashamed of, the only reason why you think injections are bad is because of war on drugs, people inject themselves or get injections with legal stuff all the time. Vaccines…?

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m not sure how you got here from there, but that’s a pretty weird take.

              Many people, perhaps even a majority, are grossed out by needles, in a similar way to blood or other physical injuries. I think warning someone about that is only fair.

              NSFW should be used to warn against things that are visually disturbing, not ideas or concepts.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                And people don’t have trauma related to drinking?

                Do we need to nsfw spiders? What about other phobias…?

                What you find non-disturbing other people will. That’s a very ignorant take.

                • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I don’t have any trauma related to needles, and I’ve had plenty of injections and blood tests over the years. I still find needles gross, like I would any other wound, and based on what’s happening in the thread, I’d say that’s a pretty common belief.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I say if you label something not safe for work because of a drug, then it must be for all drugs including caffeine. No talks about coffee at work, or doughnuts; get those added sugars out of here. Far more people die in America from heart issues than people from eating edible gummies. Why would you ban one and not the other.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    My rule of tumb: if someone is walking by would they stop and backtrack and go “WTF are you looking at at work?!” if no then it’s not NSFW. If it’s just text it’s not NSFW. ASCII art not withstanding.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Drugs in general is an overreach, but personally I think someone actively using a needle should be flagged. Regardless of what the needle is used for.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Public advertisements depict people getting vaccines and other shots. Thats a weird stance, when you could view that anywhere accidentally, not even online.

        Newspapers, news channels, etc, all depict pictures and videos of people getting vaccines.

      • Aa!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        An NSFW tag isn’t censorship, it’s a warning for people at WORK. if you don’t use it for what it’s for, that’s not working people problems, that’s your fault.

        • Oisteink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah. Or that was the original meaning like 15 years back. Now there are hide nsfw settings in most clients and some of them where thats the default

          • Aa!@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Which you can easily turn off if you don’t browse Lemmy at work.

            Just because you don’t use the tag for its intended purpose doesn’t mean everyone doesn’t. The tag has a clear purpose, denoted by what it stands for. Most people with adult jobs understand its purpose. Don’t ruin the tag’s purpose for the rest of us by devaluing it

            • Oisteink@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              That tag covers a lot of different things. This has been debated on reddit for 15 years, with no progress on other types of tags. It’s the only one, so while it says “work” it includes stuff a lot of us don’t need/want in general. It’s there to censor stuff

              • Aa!@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                It isn’t censorship if you can just turn it off and see everything. It’s a warning for people who want to browse at work but not view content that can get them in trouble

                Just turn it off and ignore it if it doesn’t apply to you. The rest of us want the tag to be used for its purpose.

                • Oisteink@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  You base this on some sort of research into usage of nsfw tagging or just pull shit out of your ass?