• angel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    13 days ago

    Rustdesk looks good on the outside, but if you look inside, it has a really bad codebase and has done some sketchy stuff in the past.

    Last year, it installed custom root certificates as trusted on windows, which is a huge security risk: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/discussions/6444

    On linux systems, it forced its own autostart with no option to disable this behavior: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/issues/4863

    In the past, when it didn’t have Wayland support yet, it edited your GDM config and just disabled wayland: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/blob/1.1.9/src/platform/linux.rs#L411-L422

    Furthermore, the code quality is really bad. 90% of the linux platform-dependant code is just executing shell commands and parsing their output, while the same could be achieved in a safe way with proper rust builtins: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/blob/master/src/platform/linux.rs

    While I agree that Rustdesk works pretty flawlessly, the codebase and the behavior of the developers made me distrust the software and I don’t recommend using it.

      • Karna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        Rustdesk controversy

        The whole discussion on that pull request is extremely sketchy, IMO.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      To add on:

      • There is no transparency about who is behind it. It just a Github account called “Rustdesk.” It could be a real company in Singapore or it could be some guy in China as people have speculated.

      • The Rustdesk software needs way more permissions than necessary. This became evident with the flatpak as they did sandbox escapes which prevented them from being on flathub

      • The Rustdesk distribution is entirely centralize release server run by Rustdesk. They could easily push out malware to lots of devices.

      • They have done some sketchy things in the past. One of the things they did was quietly switch Linux desktops back to X11.

      • The Rustdesk system is not terribly resistant to brute forcing. The weak password means they someone could try every combination.

      • Rustdesk docker deployment docker compose exposes all ports on the host. This is minor but it could lead to a sandbox excape.

      • Rustdesk servers keep getting hosted in countries that have freedom problems such as China and Russia.

      • bluetoque@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 days ago

        Wow, I’m wondering how anyone would trust this software. It literally exposes your desktop. To me that requires top-tier trust level, i.e. nothing sketchy at all.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        could be some guy in China

        I don’t see how that’s a problem, it’s not like it’s by a Chinese run company or like the Chinese government is spying on you; in the case you described it’d just be a rando with a hobby/vision.

        The fact that it keeps getting hosted in countries that have freedom problems, such as China and Russia, does concern me, though.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 days ago

      Okayyyy… thats not great. I just read one of the threads and thats scary.

      The person(s?) maintaining this seems to be VERY BAD at communicating. They did fix the auto start problem but did not at all discuss this from what I see. Thats not great.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Really sad about this, because Rust Desk has been the absolute best remote access tool I’ve ever used in the IT world, and that includes many different professional tools like Ninja& Teamviewer.

      It’s so clean, easy to install and run, fast and low latency, handles multi-monitors great, runs on mobile, Linux, Windows, etc.

      Such a shame that it is mired in controversy.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    DO NOT USE THIS

    This is a massive security risk and they have had so much controversy. They also routinely delete Github issues and discussions that question them. To top it off they are likely Chinese run.

  • pop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 days ago

    Itsfoss is blogspam and often have many mistakes and wrong info. People should really stop posting links from them.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        But why do you need a server for such a program? Can’t it be P2P or with the server stuff running on the client machine?

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 days ago

          The server is used for hole punching, to open up a P2P connection thorugh NATs and Firewalls. If it doesn’t work the server also relays the traffic between the clients.

          Getting an end to end connection through todays internet is unfortunately not easy for an average user.

        • dethada@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Theoretically, without the server, every time you want to connect to a peer you would have to figure out what’s their public IP address is, which can change. The server acts as a middleman between the peers so you dont have to do this manually, all peers only need to know the server’s IP address to connect to each other. The server is really only used for this initial linking up of peers, afterwards the connection is P2P (if possible, they fall back to a relay server if P2P fails).

  • souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I have setup a rustdesk server with docker, it was surprisingly easy to get started. It was for a friend who is managing the IT services of a small factory, the completely switched from TeamViewer and they are satisfied. More importantly their users, who are worse than your average windows user, found the transition relatively painless.

  • gibdos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Yeah it’s pretty awesome. My only gripe with it is the fact that it is super annoying when you want to send a client with your self-hosted urls to a customer.

    You can either awkardly add it to the filename or you need to fork the client and build it yourself. Kind of sucks that the easier custom client function is stuck behind their subscription.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      authentication is also stuck behind their subscription. for random customers to be able to use your servers, you also have to let everyone else on the internet use it.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    I tried it and it’s works exactly like Anydesk, except it’s 5 times slower than Anydesk at least that’s on their server, I know I can host it myself but I don’t think I have the skill to set it up

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      It works very well and there is no speed difference at all. Of course you wont ever get anything worth in life without either putting in the work or paying either with money or your privacy.

  • Rambomst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’ve been using MeshCentral lately, it does the job but the UI leaves something to be desired.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      And sadly MeshCentral is pretty much death development wise, isn’t it? The main dev left Intel and now has not enough time for the project, wasn’t that the story?

      Edit: it seems to be developed again, much slower,though. But better than nothing.

        • philpo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          I must actually revoke my statement,it seems like it is now being revived and is developed again, at a much slower pace,though.

          But much better than nothing and at least security updates seem to be working.

          Sorry for the misinformation, my bad, the different sources are quite misleading sometimes.

    • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Have you tried changing the default view from Columns to List? IMO it makes the UI much better. Then you can add in a more details about each PC on the main view. Make is very useful if you have a lot of computers you are managing.

      You can also switch from the left bar interface to top bar interface. That looks better to me. Also dark mode.

      • Rambomst@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I have changed up the view and don’t get me wrong, it’s more than usable it’s just not pretty.

  • plasticcheese@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I used this recently to help a friend with some tech stuff. The docker images were simple to bring up and within minutes we were connected. It freaked him out how easily I could get on and control his PC. I was impressed by the whole experience.