Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWe can post about feeding on them just not about feeding themlemmy.caimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down128
arrow-up1167arrow-down1imageWe can post about feeding on them just not about feeding themlemmy.caGreg Clarke@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareenkers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s implicit. If consent was given, it wouldn’t be exploitative. (And obviously, that’s contingent upon non-coersion.)
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agocommon definitions of exploitation make no mention of consent either.
It’s implicit. If consent was given, it wouldn’t be exploitative. (And obviously, that’s contingent upon non-coersion.)
common definitions of exploitation make no mention of consent either.