• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Legalize and regulate.

    Alcohol use is a big problem, but during prohibition people were going blind from bathtub gin, even before the feds would poison it and leave it in circulation.

    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not sure who downvoted you without adding anything to the discussion (coward). I think legalization is the best path forward, for both humanitarian and financial reasons. Legalize and tax the shit out of it. Use the taxes to fund education and rehabilitation.

  • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    5 months ago

    Singer believes interdiction of synthetic drugs is so difficult that U.S. policy-makers should focus resources on helping drug users find medical treatment instead of funding more law enforcement efforts.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Whats the point or motive? Doesn’t make sense to kill your consumer base from a business standpoint. Maybe they’re just dumb and trying this as a cheap filler or something, and the results are “oops, oh well”?

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Experts say the decision to experiment with xylazine, medetomidine or other chemicals in illicit street drug combinations likely reflect which substances are cheap, poorly regulated and readily available.

      Money. I think there’s always new customers. But I do see your point.

  • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It really feels like drug users’ demand for drugs that don’t kill them would create a market for artisanal drugs, like with the alcohol industry.

    If I had any interest in hard drugs, I would be terrified to use them now. I know we’re dealing with addicts who aren’t making good decisions, but aren’t there wealthy coke fiends? How can anyone snort lines at a party if they don’t know if it has all this lethal shit in it?

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You do the first line and all of a sudden you don’t really care about the repercussions of the next few

    • Dewe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hmmm maybe there is another use for quotes… Like when someone has said something and you’re conveying exactly what they said. A ‘quote’ of sorts.