hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square473fedilinkarrow-up1131arrow-down147file-text
arrow-up184arrow-down1imageA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square473fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredeaf_fish@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoWhy? The sign seems fine to me.
minus-squareKedly@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoBecause thereal’s version is welcoming and non discriminatory, and the meme is antagonistic by design
minus-squaredeaf_fish@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoYes, it is antagonistic. But is it bad to be antagonistic to people who think that men’s feelings are more important that women’s safety?
minus-squareKedly@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoYeah, ok, with this response and your other one, I’m blocking you now
Why? The sign seems fine to me.
Because thereal’s version is welcoming and non discriminatory, and the meme is antagonistic by design
Yes, it is antagonistic. But is it bad to be antagonistic to people who think that men’s feelings are more important that women’s safety?
Yeah, ok, with this response and your other one, I’m blocking you now