• spiderwort@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well that’s the question.

    Voting means lots of dummies, a sea of propaganda… Bad stuff there too.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      While I can agree that dummies shouldn’t be allowed to vote, how would/could/should we go about designing a proper voter verification program that more or less eliminates the actual dummies/sheeple?

      But I don’t think taking the voter factor completely out of the equation in favor of pure raw science is the answer either.

      If you leave everything to science, then science would say the world is overpopulated and we should eliminate half or more of the population…

      • spiderwort@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        I read a short story where they took a humane approach to population reduction.

        An engineered disease. A short fever and then your uterus stops working. 95% effective.

        Rioting. All scientists hung. But the world was better.

        • hperrin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ah yes, forced sterilization. Very humane.

          That’s called fascism. You read a fascist fan-fic. I guarantee the people who were forcefully sterilized wouldn’t agree that the world was better.