I used what known as 2’s compliment. Take the complement (flip all the bits - here that would give you 01110
which is 14) then add 1.
A typical bike-riding leftist urbanite who also happens to be a hockey-crazy Western Canadian.
I used what known as 2’s compliment. Take the complement (flip all the bits - here that would give you 01110
which is 14) then add 1.
Did you only try F2? It’s possible the graphical session is on tty2 - see if ctl+alt+F1/ 3 does anything
Not a myth. What’s inside the fridge doesn’t really matter when talking about efficiency. It pretty much only depends on the rate at which energy seeps into the fridge from outside. All else being equal, chest fridges allow significantly less heat transfer through an open door than regular fridges, and are therefore a more efficient design.
You’re completely right about the second part, though. It’s just not practical, and the fact you would have to keep the door open longer while you rummage around for stuff renders the point moot anyway.
You should look into kodi. It’s a big screen oriented media player/organizer app.
This is why carbon pricing should be done upfront. Pretty hard to lie about the physical volume of fossil fuels getting delivered to your factory
Arrows are more descriptive. \vec is better.
Have you ever noticed those low effort reposts also getting the same top 10 comments as the original? It’s slop all the way down.
GNOME spawning 3 new DEs every time they have a major version update
A message from the government of Alberta
Rauschenberg’s white painting was the OG placebo meme.
Not just mp3, all lossy audio formats use psychoacoustic analysis. That’s how they figure out which data to throw out.
The one on the left is definitely more haunted, though.
Not sure if sarcasm or actual disinformation. You’re not supposed to trust the aur, that’s kinda the whole point of it. The build scripts are transparent enough to allow users to manage their own risk, and at no point does building a package require root access.
So probably not tomorrow.
Definitely the day after tomorrow.
Probably have a few cards running the displays and the rest of them mining some sphere-themed memecoin
That’s an interesting comparison and something I’ve wondered about quite a bit. I would be surprised if machine drivers were not categorically safer than human ones, and if safety is (rightly) a priority in the cost-benefit analysis of driverless car adoption, then it’s hard to imagine not concluding that we ought to proceed in that direction.
But I think this specific incident illustrates very well that the human vs. machine driver debate is tragically myopic. If an infallible machine driver adhering perfectly to traffic laws is empowered to accelerate from a standstill directly into a violent collision with a pedestrian, then maybe it doesn’t matter how “safe” the driver is. I take it as evidence that car travel the way we have it set up is inherently unsafe. Our traffic laws emphasize the convenience of car traffic above everything else – including safety – and only really serve to shift blame when something goes wrong. Despite its certainty, there is very little builtin allowance for human error aside from the begrudging mercy of other parties.
To be fair, human drivers are an unmitigated disaster which we really need to do something about, but I think if we’re going to go through the messy process of reforming how we think about cars, we might as well go farther than a marginal improvement. We could solve the underlying problem and abolish the institution of car dependency altogether, for instance. Otherwise it just amounts to slapping a futuristic band-aid on a set of social and economic issues that will continue to cause unimaginable harm.
This doesn’t seem that complex to me. If there is a pedestrian in front of your car when the light turns green, you wait. Pretty fucking simple. This isn’t some offshoot of the trolley problem where an incident was unavoidable. The car made the active decision to proceed when it was not safe to do so.
Why have we programmed our self-driving cars to emulate the psychotic behaviour of a typical road ragin’ car-brained human? Isn’t that the problem these projects should be trying to solve?
“Steam gauges” on car/plane instrument panels. Yeah, digital displays are cheaper to manufacture and less prone to failure, but they kinda suck the fun out of it.