If you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
If you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
Making your own protocols means vulnerabilities are more likely. Better to use one that’s been tested and audited (unless it’s following something like this EU thing of course)
Lol that’s exactly what this was. I wrote this python script, and he went through and added comments like this a day before the deadline.
Not trying to throw shade on him though, it’s more the university’s fault for not explaining what makes a useful comment. I just thought it was funny
Oh my god that trailer was so good
You know the bot that replies with a haiku if your comments syllables match? They should do this instead
A tower defense game with a microprocessor theme
Does anyone remember that club penguin tower defence game where you defend against computer viruses?
Ok, I mean if you’re getting financially screwed by your partner in a divorce, it’s probably a good thing that you’re getting divorced.
To further explain, the joke is that “tomo tawa” could mean either “car” or “moving house”
Here’s an underrated game recommendation: Patrick’s Parabox. Probably the most well designed puzzle game I’ve ever played.
Pseudoregalia mentioned!
Also lol at “worse graphics” for Rainworld. An amazing looking game. Though it probably doesn’t actually mean worse graphics, just less realistic graphics
the world also needs more concise games
Yeah!
those 20-40 hour masterpieces
…wait, concise?
That’s impressive, getting the dogs to all sit at the table at once
Don’t know how to post the boomerang, but passed everything else (I think) as a 20 year old gen z
Haven’t really used them but the main thing I’ve heard is that Godot is a lot simpler to use, especially for 2D games. With Godot you can also use many different languages, while Unity only supports C#. I’ve heard that Godot’s 3D engine isn’t as fully fleshed out as Unity’s though. I’ve seen complaints about the lighting engine, for example.
It wouldn’t need to say HighContrastForAccessibilityPurposes though, it would ideally just be HighContrast, and the “for accessibility purposes” would be a comment, right?
Top or bottom?
(Taskbar positions)
Right, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying