"negative peace "

cringe and/or lame

cringe

imagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing.

does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?

no. power centralized in the beaurocratic state apparatus is also oppressive. electoral politics are a sham, and democracy is impotent when the capital owning class can simply buy influence.

if 9 people vote to kill the 10th, is that just?

hot garbage

the neck cares not the color of the boot

reminder:

left-unity means authoritarian entryism

tolerance must function as a social contract, or not at all.

reject auth apologists.

tolerance is a social contract, not a principle.

je suis l’etat-man

tongue-ass national forest😻

profit is theft

completely ignoring the relationship in which a worker must sell their labor as a commodity to a capital-owning class.

work != labor

this is the most generous possible interpretation of the gadsden, while ignoring its current usage, as well as ignoring the anti-authoritarian meaning behind the sabocat, and red/black scheme.

ps: the American revolution was a lateral move, replacing a hereditary monarchy with a dictatorship of capital. The ‘founding fathers’ were their time’s equivalent of musk and bezos, and they explicitly wanted to protect the interest of the capital owning class from the will of the working class and those humans who they kept as property.

https://lemmy.world/c/jbrc

feryer health

popular elections in an ecosystem 1/4 bots, in which the admins hold ultimate unilateral authority.

“this”

but really, I wonder how much of what we’re feeling is the absence of repost bots, and serial karma farmers.

they yearn for the glorious people’s boot

“what if our classless stateless society had the right class controlling the state?”