I’m using the public instance routinely, and it does the job well.
Sono un dottorando in astronomia. Non sopporto le “questioni di orgoglio” e le “questioni di reputazione”.
I’m using the public instance routinely, and it does the job well.
Well, we know this feeling very well here
Love my Era
I’m sure a lot of people will be infinitely thankful!!
I did, last time two months ago. Unfortunately their presentation software is pretty minimal at the moment, and I prefer the fully open ODP standard. Anyways, at the time there was an issue with videos that weren’t playing at all.
I saw a Libreoffice community but wasn’t very active… so I thought here I could find users of the software and experts on the possible technical issue. Hope this doesn’t bother too much.
I think it’s right
Edit:
TIL: when saying random numbers, some people think to integers, others to real numbers.
I love sixel! On Konsole it works out of the box, and it’s my main way to work with plots on headless remote machine 😊.
Kate is my togo. With a terminal panel and latex->Unicode plugin is perfect for julia. I don’t need it, but you can also set up its LSP client.
From what I understood, links to the conversation that have been created for sharing them.
Thanks a lot!!
I would recommend MX Linux. It’s solid and has a lot of nice and simple plus that are very much appreciated (a menu entries editor, some selected packages not available in debian, grub editor and helper, a very active and welcoming community)
Well, I never refuse watching Pitch Perfect and The Dictator (by Sasha Baron Cohen). I’m sorry to lower the standard 😅
Ugh do you think this will be a threat to the spirit of Mastodon?
Love that app 😍
I’d love to open links in browser, too!
I had the same issue recently, since sometimes you need a chromium-based browser. After some research, I decided to opt for Mulch. It is available on F-Droid through DivestOS repo just as Mull (my main browser).
Also a searx user. I started recently and the ability to.choose the engines for the various categories is something I never thought of. The science category, for example, is extremely nice.
But is this maybe because “blocking” is a feature that requires too much programming on twitter? I don’t see the point in this.
The most important aspect is peer review. At least in physics, journals assign your paper to an Editor (a scientist), that may reject it directly if it is not scientific. If it is, they will send it to another scientist to read the work and (a) suggest rejection, (b) suggest accepting the work directly or © in the most common scenario accept the paper for publication after some revisions. The editor reads the review and the informs the author of the paper accordingly, and the story iterates until the work is fine for the reviewer. There can be more than one reviewer (a.k.a. referee). The editor is what the journal offers, together with some spell checking service before publication. Editors are payed, and referees only sometimes.
There are notable, noble exceptions known as diamond open access journals, like my favourite: the Open Journal of Astrophysics