Despite me not eating meat, I can see this being tasty – as long as the bottom of the cake is not chocolate and the quark is not very sweet
wwa, lewactwo
Despite me not eating meat, I can see this being tasty – as long as the bottom of the cake is not chocolate and the quark is not very sweet
And posts like this one alienate them even further and simply confirm what they’re told, that the educated elites hate them
0.5% gets you seats in German system?
If we all respected that rule from all sides, we’d have a lot less unnecessary hatred and death.
You’re addressing wrong people with that
Obviously the perspective of lying on the bed face-up. Though I may be biased because our bed is next to the window (feet side) so you can’t look at it form the foot of the bed – either from the side or behind our heads
Which doesn’t change the fact that the new movies are snoozefest
I’m European but I’m an English second language speaker, so that may be the reason I use this words that way. However wikipedia for example calls the male part the plug and the female the receptacle as well
Plug is on the male part on the cable. Receptacle is the female part on the device
The “empty” half of the plug (with the two hollow squares) is either at the top or on the right in 99% of cases. Once you realize that you barely ever have to flip it even one time.
Shouldn’t solar panels be mapped if and only if they consistent of a separate structure and not part of the roof?
I never understood the point of lawyers. Their job is to literally throw off the court in the process of determining the truth and choosing punishment for crime. For everyone else this would be another crime called “obstruction of justice”, and yet for lawyers it’s their actual job that courts allow.
I thought everyone disappeared and the guy from the first picture was the only person left. The speech bubble also seemed to come from him just behind the horizon
??? You know very well what I meant, be more forgiving to second-language speakers
There are decades and there are decades. Just like there are weeks (period between Monday and Sunday inclusive) and weeks (any seven consecutive days).
When you say “I’ll do this next week”, then you mean the next period between Monday and Sunday. When you say you’ll do it in a week, it means you’ll do it after exactly 7 days from now, regardless of what day is it today. Same for decades.
So in your idea there would be year +0 and year -0 before it, right?
For the same reason why 1.5 is on the right from 1 but -1.5 is on the left from -1
the idea that the year 2000 is the start of the 21st century is hurting my head.
That may be because it is not. The first century was years 1 to 100. The second was 101 to 200. The 21st is therefore 2001 to 2100.
What you’re probably referring to is the “cultural century” which was considered to have started when the lead digit changed from 1 to 2. The same thing happened quite recently when some people argued 2020 was the start of a new decade (again, it wasn’t)
When you consider the time as a number line, years are not points at integers (which would in some way warrant a year 0), but rather periods between them. Year 1 is the period between 0 and 1, and before that was -1 to 0, or year -1. There is no year 0, because there isn’t anything between 0 and 0
In what world would enhancing a product warrant a cease and desist, lol