Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out
Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out
Economics: How much are you willing to pay?
Smarter you in a few years ;)
I’m with you on that. My comment was more like sometimes the appendices seem to get out of hand. They probably contain entire papers there.
No need to rush to conclusions, I do read appendices when needed. My point is not that authors should cut the appendices or compromise on any other good open science practices. The point is that disproportionately large appendices make one wonder if some of that stuff actually belongs in the main text. If it is just a robustness check that gives a similar result, fine, make a footnote in the main text and put the analysis in the appendix. But what if it is actually relevant information that changes the perception of the main text?
The bladder tells the balls that it’s time
I mean, it is kind of hard to push the stuff through initially when the thing is hard. But I guess you’re right that aiming becomes a bigger issue.
Pretty sure that’s referee 2
Certainly makes it hard to pee
And pee yourself
Is it even possible? I mean, your bladder would probably scream so loud that the brain would give up
Only this morning? Lucky bastard.
Biological clock in action
I am almost never able to get back to sleep after “answering the call.” It’s like the brain get a signal to start working.
that’s a life pro tip right there
I knew I was in the right place
They talk about many things, but the one that stands out is incentives. There is a lot of competition in academia, publish or perish, with big prizes, so some people are taking shortcuts.
These were great, really enjoyed them, especially the coverage of the Data Colada story
Which metric to use is also related to how they are going to enforce it. Surely they won’t weigh cars. It’s more realistic to base it on makes.
Or the only person who phrases your issue this way) so many times I’ve found out that I just state my problem in an unusual way