Correction. English children will be taught this. Education is a devolved matter in the UK so this will not apply to the other parts of the UK
Correction. English children will be taught this. Education is a devolved matter in the UK so this will not apply to the other parts of the UK
I wouldn’t really call the Labour party progressive
Coffee. There are a couple of Lemmy communities but none of them are that active. Reddit had r/coffee and r/espresso that were both fairly active
Even better. The countdown resets if you look away
Discrimination based on gender identity is basically saying I have been treated differently due to being transgender. She is saying that she as a transgender woman is being treated differently to a cisgender woman. Or that is at least how it works in the UK. I would presume Australia is similar
This case is being heard in Sydney, Australia not the US so a case from the US is not relevant in determining the outcome
There is technically an unwinnable sts seed
It’s specifically for gender identity clinics so only applies to trans kids
A lot of these comments are American so I thought I would provide a different point of view. In the UK it is a legal requirement for some broadcasters to have a certain percentage of signed programmes.
Tim Eicke, the UK judge at the ECtHR. He gave a talk at my university and I briefly spoke to him afterwards
I feel like there are 2 related arguments against this. One is that it could motivate political prosecution to disenfranchise people. The second is that it kind of creates a slippery slope, if treason disenfranchises you why not murder, or rape, or election fraud or whatever other crime someone considers serious enough