(This makes 2 servings)

I put one cup of dry beans (either pinto or black) in the pot with three cups of water and cook for ten minutes.

Then I quick-release and add the seasoning and 1 cup of rice, and also usually a cup of frozen veggies, stir, and cook for fifteen minutes, followed by another quick-release. Dish into bowls and add sour cream, cheese, nutritional yeast, whatever you like.

Takes about 40-45 minutes in total, but the vast majority of that is downtime that you can use for other things. Less than five minutes of actual prep/hands on time.

Rice and beans in the instant pot with a pinch of Goya Adobo, maybe a bit of sour cream when it’s done. Delish, cheap, easy, low cleanup, and good for ya.

between climate inaction and retreat

FTFY. One is still better than the other, but let’s not kid ourselves here.

Lol one of the last things I did on Reddit was get banned for mentioning “death of the author”

People like you are the reason I’m running Linux Mint on all of my PCs now, and I couldn’t be happier. Keep fighting the good fight!

Can’t wait to hear the tankie apologetics for this one.

Why would you want slightly warm cake batter in the first place?

Social mixed media

The other one has chocolate syrup.

Cuz he’s an obnoxious, blatantly incendiary grifter (but he’s a grifter who shits on the people we don’t like, so we gotta stan him here because tribalism!).

Whenever I open a post and see Jeff Turdrich’s face, I immediately close without reading, and downvote the post.

Unless you’re suggesting that this man was involved in that situation, there’s room to feel sympathy for both murder victims.

This cop is either one of the ones committing atrocities, or one of the ones that stand by, hold the “thin blue line”, and enable the ones committing atrocities.

ACAB has no exceptions.

There hasn’t been a need for a new Civ since IV so I already wasn’t gonna buy it, but now I’m gonna not buy it even harder.

As Upton himself said: “I aimed for America’s heart, but I hit it in its stomach.”

Great question! The answer is that, well, you don’t, but that’s not what I’m intending unstained to mean here.

As it turns out, “unstained” is structurally ambiguous, because English has two different “un-” prefixes, each of which has different functions and different category selection requirements.

The first attaches to verbs, and means “reverse the action of”, e.g. un-tie, un-do, un-stain, etc. The second attaches to adjectives, and means “not X”, e.g. un-happy, un-satisfied, etc.

So, if we want to form the word “undoable”, we can either take the verb “do” and attach “-able” first, giving us an adjective “doable” to which we can then add “un-” to give us “undoable”, an adjective meaning “not able to be done” (“Flying by flapping your arms is undoable”)
OR
We can take “do” and add the other “un-” first, giving us a verb “undo” meaning “to reverse the action of something” to which we can then add the suffix “-able”, giving us “undoable”, a different adjective meaning “able to be undone” (“Simple knots are easily undoable”)

So, while both of these look and sound like the same word, they actually have different structures that correspond to the differences in their meanings.

In my OP, you read “unstained” as “unstain-ed”, with “un-” attaching to “stain” to give a verb “unstain” meaning “to reverse the staining of”, and then added the participle suffix, while my intended structure was to attach “stain” and “-ed” first, giving a participle (adjective) “stained”, to which we can then add the other prefix “un-”, giving “un-stained” “not stained”.

deleted by creator

This would be more like un-stained glass than stained glass.

Hawaii has wild cattle that you can hunt. Not native, but still quite wild, and very dangerous.

More like those Ancestral Archers down in Siofra. They’re hitting me with railguns travelling at Mach 12 from halfway across the map.

I still have deep-seated, instinctual nightmares of the merg.