h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]

I mean she literally ate cigarettes

All this supposed government overreach that is being railed against was instituted by the tories. Even if these were sincere, genuine, and good proposals the framing is both dishonest and hypocritical.

Further, low traffic neighborhoods are good actually. It’s GOOD that people can walk to places without getting hit by cars.
Bus lanes should not be occupied by normal cars, because then it’s not a fucking bus lane.
Fining local councils for street work taking a long time doesn’t actually make any fucking sense.

Shout out to Frankie Boyle who decided that the important thing to pursue literally in the middle of Israel gunning down protesters with machine guns and the labour right openly sabotaging their own platform was Corbyn’s antisemitism. Frankie Boyle is a fucking coward, and I would say that to his face.

It is endlessly frustrating to see the tories have any kind of traction with a narrative of opposing an oppressive or overreaching government direction. They ARE the government, they HAVE BEEN the government since 2010, and before the Blair years they were the government since 1979

deleted by creator

It depends on what comes up first. If we’re talking about diet obviously you have to bring up Arch, and if you’re talking about software you gotta bring up veganism

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Yes or one of those weird ice cream things that has an extremely cold surface, or one of those things where you roll it in ice water or a million machines. “Machine that makes things cold” isn’t sci fi.

It’s not. A device that rapidly cools things down placed inside it isn’t implausible. He’s not asking for a beam of absence, he’s asking for an enclosed space that subtracts heat.

The guy who ran Cuyamel back when they were bribing the Honduran government and after that the United Fruit Company supposedly spent the rest of his life drafting social welfare legal proposals for democrats. Which given just how evil the United Fruit Company was is more of an indictment of new deal legislation than anything else tbh.

They get to chew on the cookie as we load the guns, it’s only fair

Rhebus posting is what the youth do now. Get with the times gramps

It’s worse than that, because a company bylaw also gives every GOOG stock a set value of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a cent and a binding part of their issuance is the clause that they can demand to buy them back for that price at any time. Google can drop like pocket lint and instantly buy all GOOG stock back.

Google stock is literally worthless and does not represent an actual stake in the company for example