Dark Arc is spot on, also, the original package is taken off from snap store due to Twilio killing their authy desktop app:
Dark Arc is spot on, also, the original package is taken off from snap store due to Twilio killing their authy desktop app:
Walk without a rhytm, and you won’t attract the worm!
I’ve read his book a few years ago, and he was pretty bullish on risky investments, so…
I hear this photo
I use a usff Lenovo thinkcentre m97p with external hdds for media. It has 4th-gen i5 (2 cores) and 8GB of ram. If I don’t use transcoding, it’s perfectly capable. For transcoding it would depend on the media :) I only stream fullhd.
First Diablo 4 and now this… Horrible company.
I see Kansas, but where’s Kan’tsas?
Lots of hardware lies about its useful capabilities.
Can you run 4k? Of course. But can you run more than 4 frames a second?
Both are valid (if you’d add seconds) in both RFC 3339 and ISO 8601, but timezone support is the same here and there…
Yeah, and the same thing would happen if e.g. PII or HIPAA related would end up in trained model. The fact that some PII or health data ended up being publicly available, doesn’t mean that automatically you can process or store such data, and train on such data.
If you do stuff, earn from it, and ignore parties and their rights, you are forced to compensate. I guess it will be peanuts though.
The AI companies shown that they are incapable of regulating themselves on this topic, and so people with art at stake should force their hand.
Open source or not doesn’t matter here, what matters is the copyright. If even Disney can defend works they own (whatever their ethics), so should anyone else.
That’s exactly what’s at stake, waiting to be sufficiently litigated. And I hope that creators will win, and that they would be able to tell if they allow richest big tech companies in the world to train on their creations.
It is missing one point: as a creator, I want to be able to forbid you from training on my creations. And the only tool that could enable that is the copyright enforcement over AI training.
Mind you, Feynmann clearly states this is a fraction, and denotes it with “/” likely to make sure you treat it as a fraction.
It’s not about not using safety standards.
It’s about learning how to drive in a way that you won’t put anyone else in danger.
Safety fearures are only a tool, you are the person who controls a 2000 pound vehicles that can kill others, so drive responsibly.
This is so fucking stupid because you can apply it to literally any safety standard.
And then you write something exactly opposite.
OP writes about “drive to the conditions” which is like… Your responsibility as the driver. If you can’t react to people on the road, slow down.
And you write about being recless.
I really like it, and I miss it on Linux. On Linux, I have to trust that each and every sh/bash script, package install script, or some stuff you download from internet are actually safe and don’t access your private stuff. On mac I get the prompt when some software needs to access a specific folder.
Chainmail does not secure against punctures, only cuts.