So, protestant?

Yup! People will have no job because of this. The least they can do is be honest and unambiguous.

Fun is, depth isn’t.

Fair enough.

It tends to lead to hyperactive minds…

Citation need, I think.

But that’s what happened here. The x-axis has been unevenly distributed.

A mention is not the same as an appearance, so the discrepancy for some characters could be even greater if you take that into account.

How else can you make it look like a linear grouping?

I would even consider watching it of they covered it!

I’m more surprised by them referring to it as the fourth instalment at all.

This movie is supposedly a reboot, so not part of the same storyline as the previous three.

Yet, that is what those words seem to communicate.

Marketing? Sloppy writing?

Pre-Madonna, I think.

Having read it again not too long ago, I was actually surprised by how much of it was not good.

The framework was interesting, but much of the actual writing wasn’t nearly as good as I had thought.

Maybe it’s because I had read it in a Dutch translation the first couple of times, and the translator had had improved the prose without intending to, or maybe it’s because it was many years ago.

Whatever the reason, I felt like it needed another pass of the editor.

The movie, on the other hand, still thrills me every time I see it.