so why not copy them?
oh, I totally agree with you.
In fact standards are made to be copied. That’s like the entire point of them.
so why not copy them?
oh, I totally agree with you.
In fact standards are made to be copied. That’s like the entire point of them.
People behind ISO 216 thought of everyting
how to make a good standard:
step 1: copy from DIN
Accusing a man of being “ergi,” which is basically unmanly, was enough of an insult to be answered with blood
“using gay as an insult” is not proof of extreme homophobia. By that logic every teenager on the planet would be extreme homophobic.
In fact, pretty much every descriptive word can be used as an insult. If anything your example proofs, that vikings take insults very serious.
because of two bodies can not occupy the same space, the feather and the ball will be in different position when you drop them. And therefor gravitation will pull the earth slightly more toward the ball and slightly less toward the feather.
I like the explanation that devious spirits cannot say this phrase and that’s why it’s used
Evil spirits can not say the same word twice in a row. Foxes can not say “moshi”. With “moshi moshi” you get a 2-for-1 special.
the other stuff isn’t too wild either.
how does it compare to yt-dlp?
Most Adobe tools don’t have any good free alternatives even for home use.
inkscape is on a level with illustrator (maybe even better)
for drawing: try krita
if you want to pay money (much much less than for adobe): Affinity is on a level with fotoshop
if you just want to make a simple program. It still needs to run in kubernetes.
“hello OPS-team. Here is my simple program. Have fun running it on your kubernetes”
fucking Heritage Foundation, wow.
At this point they are just evil for the sake of being evil.
It’s at most 40 years old technolog
the 60s were 60 years ago
Only reason to include 2 full bridge rectifiers
they look like runes.
. But it is trained well enough to correlate left and right together
eliza could do that 60 years ago
But only temporarily
but is it?
I thought the temporal improvement would be for everyone who already used the high way (because they will get to their destination a little bit faster). And for the few extra people, who start to use the highway but didn’t use it before, the improvment will stay.
When you add a new lane to a road, people think that the traffic will be easier there, so they take that route instead of their normal one
so for these people the new lane will create marginal improvement, right?
aber
is this declaration about e2e in general, or is there a specific new rollout they are referencing?
Our societies have not previously tolerated spaces that are beyond the reach of law enforcement, where criminals can communicate safely and child abuse can flourish.
I am pretty sure, churches were “tolerated spaces” bevor e2ee was a thing.
However you will now have rodent problems
chicken got you covered on that front too https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iubf1oJdQQQ
is it still owned by tencent?