I don’t see

Finally, we agree on something. Cheers.

If you believe that hateful, harmful ideas shouldn’t be challenged and should be allowed to stand on their own as long as the person spewing them is sufficienly annoying, sure, mate. Unfair characterization.

Or maybe you just said even dumber shit in response and they changed their mind. Even the brightest among us may never know. Truly confounding.

You have now retreated to “but they promised they would stop talking,” btw. Just keeping you aware of the scoreboard here, so to speak.

“Oh, I’m spreading rhetoric that hurts people? Why are you even responding to it, then?”

Your entire edit is actually a perfect microcosm of the victim blaming mentality, but (poorly) disguised as a virtue signal about victim blaming. Well done mate. Despicable.

Misandry is when someone says men who believe women shouldn’t be allowed to vote are abusive.

Thank you for that elevated, nuanced take, king.

When you lie under oath as a defense attorney, witness, or defendant versus the state, it is called “perjury.”

When you lie under oath as a prosecutor, solicitor, district attorney, or cop, it’s called “Tuesday.”

Yes

God, it upsets me so much when other people talk about things I already know. UGH. I should make a post about this. My feelings are more relevant than world news.

At this point, it just feels like I’m punching down. So I’m gonna go ahead and stop, because you clearly are not equipped to meet me where I am.

Please continue spamming the same link with the same commentary. They are sure to listen to you if you just scream louder. You aren’t swinging at ghosts at all. :)

“Old” is subjective, and I’d still say they’re old and have been repeated ad nauseum, but you definitely left out the context that would cast doubt on your initial message. This is intellectually dishonest.

I wish you’d quote what I said about the thesaurus and take that into consideration, too. There are other words besides “internally appointed CEO” and “cult.” It’s literally just spam for spam’s sake. We get it dude, you’re mad at the church. Go be mad at it someplace other than a news thread.

You don’t come across as someone who cares about these issues or the people who have been hurt by the church. You come across as someone exploiting death for the sake of argument, which makes you no better than the Catholic church by your own admission.

Now fuck off back to r/atheism and quit spamming lemmy news threads with edgy drivel.

Yeah yeah yeah you’ve spammed the same thing all over the thread and I don’t give a fuck. We all know the issues with religion.

It’s already been shown elsewhere you’re sensationalizing old stories to turn another person’s death into your soapbox. It’s crass, and it turns people away from your message. If you’re going to use someone’s death as a jumping-off point for pointless masturbatory anti-religious rhetoric, be prepared for people to see it for what it is and you for what you are. Or at least use a fucking thesaurus dude.

There’s a time and place to be a euphoric neckbeard. This is neither.

Also here after a reddit ban. Mine was also politically motivated.

I watched admins remove a comment that was not violent, no profanity, nothing like that. The offense: the commenter described what “black-bagging” was, in reference to the immigrants being abducted around the country. Someone asked what “black-bagging” meant, he replied with one sentence just explaining the meaning of the term, comment nuked within five minutes.

I then told this story in another comment in another thread. Didn’t say shit about Musk or Trump. Just told the story of how reddit admins wouldn’t let this guy explain what black-bagging meant.

Permanent ban within one hour for “ban evasion.” Never been banned prior. It was my first and last reddit ban.

Fuck spez, fuck reddit, fuck the rest of em all.

Then how will you listen for the testicular gallop