![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/e6e28ccd-aa5d-4d95-a8cb-859063743f4d.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
They all technically are subject to the same terms, they just don’t bug you about it the way suse does
They all technically are subject to the same terms, they just don’t bug you about it the way suse does
Is this what’s meant by the null hypothesis?
It’s German, so it’s susa
You can help by expanding it
Eh, depends. If it’s the around-the-neck kind of crystals, no way. If it’s in a radio circuit, now, that’s a different story.
Honestly super fucking surprised they got any sentence at all. Their sheriff should be right there with them.
He actually didn’t miss her. At least not 70 times. We don’t know how many times he tried to stab her.
Alpine is fucking bae. I love that little distro so goddamned much.
Seitan is cool but I really want to try jack fruit
I prefer writing in “Satan” over leaving it blank
We need a Wolfenstein CAPTCHA that just asks “select all Nazis” to reiterate that being a Nazi is fucking bad.
based
And with that, FiskFisk33 was enlightened.
Certainly, I don’t disagree with that at all. And that’s likely part of the reason so few people publish failures, because there’s no “reward”. All I was saying is there’s still value there.
I wish more people would publish their failures. Definitive proof that a hypothesis is wrong is just as solid a result as definitive proof the hypothesis is right.
I hate that I can’t photosynthesize.
our our
Ok but a soda or carbonated water that has lost most of its target fizzyness quotient (scientific term) is still regarded as being flat even if it has some carbonation left. If it were a sliding scale instead of “a” vs “b”, then we could imagine a “locally flat” taste profile while admitting that the whole is not entirely flat. Which is a perfect description of Earth’s geometry.
No, not if you’re not American